Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Empire 8 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st St. John Fisher 1,363.3553 1,328.1729 1,345.6491 51.43 55.85 0.058
2nd Nazareth 1,312.6100 1,273.5230 1,292.9188 49.77 53.01 -0.012
3rd Houghton 1,288.5278 1,253.3488 1,270.8166 45.65 51.22 -0.027
4th Hartwick 1,258.1624 1,221.0102 1,239.4471 46.28 51.19 -0.048
5th Alfred 1,190.8012 1,158.4029 1,174.4903 42.40 47.72 -0.109
6th Elmira 1,193.7518 1,152.4644 1,172.9264 46.66 45.92 -0.120
7th Sage Colleges 1,137.4983 1,103.6812 1,120.4622 39.76 44.68 -0.148
8th Utica 1,067.8272 1,036.3536 1,051.9727 41.23 39.47 -0.236

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st St. John Fisher 0.1822 32.89 14.66 30.64 54.35 4.23 12.21
2nd Nazareth 0.1598 31.59 15.61 29.71 53.74 4.62 10.37
3rd Houghton 0.1474 33.61 18.87 30.84 49.49 4.85 11.24
4th Hartwick 0.1378 29.30 15.53 26.62 54.29 4.35 8.02
5th Alfred 0.1092 28.14 17.22 26.79 58.56 3.35 9.57
6th Elmira 0.0980 26.56 16.76 24.03 57.80 5.66 9.26
7th Sage Colleges 0.0772 23.69 15.97 22.71 63.93 4.02 5.65
8th Utica 0.0360 21.64 18.04 19.79 64.52 4.90 6.31

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st St. John Fisher 0.1238 29.04 16.67 26.27 57.94 4.15 9.19
2nd Nazareth 0.1718 31.88 14.70 29.12 56.34 3.61 8.90
3rd Houghton 0.1745 33.71 16.26 30.72 51.79 2.91 9.70
4th Hartwick 0.1859 33.82 15.23 31.39 51.96 3.63 9.46
5th Elmira 0.2177 36.20 14.43 32.16 48.68 3.64 11.47
6th Alfred 0.2180 37.36 15.56 34.45 48.33 4.35 11.16
7th Sage Colleges 0.2248 36.99 14.51 33.84 51.47 3.73 11.66
8th Utica 0.2721 41.11 13.89 37.45 47.77 2.24 14.36

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,208.5854 1,211.8436 1,214.4201 1,206.9687 1,210.4544
Difference 3.2582 5.8347 -1.6167 2.4921

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
St. John Fisher 115 2,387 1,291 310 376 54.09 7.7 6.3 2,069 940 212 234 54.57 9.8 8.8
Nazareth 119 2,174 1,159 262 327 53.31 8.3 6.6 2,000 961 221 226 51.95 9.0 8.8
Houghton 90 2,103 1,102 258 216 52.40 8.2 9.7 1,870 895 178 219 52.14 10.5 8.5
Hartwick 101 1,889 986 216 222 52.20 8.7 8.5 1,731 830 166 192 52.05 10.4 9.0
Elmira 108 1,564 794 224 229 50.77 7.0 6.8 1,719 930 275 252 45.90 6.3 6.8
Alfred 104 1,990 945 214 217 47.49 9.3 9.2 2,175 1,142 246 229 47.49 8.8 9.5
Sage Colleges 100 1,619 705 147 160 43.55 11.0 10.1 1,920 1,033 237 244 46.20 8.1 7.9
Utica 90 1,365 622 122 92 45.57 11.2 14.8 1,897 1,142 281 202 39.80 6.8 9.4
Conference Average 103 1,886 951 219 230 49.92 8.9 9.0 1,923 984 227 225 48.76 8.7 8.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Empire 8

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

61.07

2019-10-25
Nazareth
Hartwick
3
1
25
17
27
25
24
26
25
15
GAME

60.46

2019-10-11 Pittsford, N.Y.
St. John Fisher
Houghton
3
1
23
25
25
16
26
24
25
21
GAME

59.09

2019-09-27 Elmira, N.Y.
Elmira
Houghton
1
3
25
19
25
27
23
25
20
25
GAME

58.49

2019-10-12 Alfred, NY
Alfred
St. John Fisher
2
3
25
17
22
25
25
20
18
25
13
15
GAME

58.07

2019-09-27 Albany, NY
Sage Colleges
Nazareth
2
3
23
25
26
28
25
16
25
19
16
18
GAME

57.91

2019-09-18 Elmira, N.Y.
Elmira
Hartwick
3
0
27
25
29
27
25
20
GAME

57.00

2019-10-26 Pittsford, N.Y.
St. John Fisher
Hartwick
3
1
25
15
25
21
21
25
25
23
GAME

56.66

2019-10-12
Houghton
Nazareth
3
1
16
25
25
23
25
22
25
20
GAME

56.18

2019-09-28 Oneonta, NY
Hartwick
Houghton
0
3
20
25
23
25
23
25
GAME

56.04

2019-11-08 Pittsford, NY
Houghton
Nazareth
1
3
16
25
20
25
25
22
18
25

HuskerGeek Empire 8 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 19.8049
2 18.5920
3 17.1021
4 15.1841
5 14.4244
6 13.5456
7 13.3939
8 13.2080
9 12.7790
10 12.5431

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.8814
2 10.1847
3 9.5835
4 8.6296
5 8.3872
6 8.3734
7 7.0152
8 6.9263
9 6.9044
10 6.5752

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.2813
2 10.5077
3 10.3480
4 9.6202
5 9.0383
6 8.2578
7 8.2026
8 7.8728
9 7.6793
10 7.5235

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2221
2 0.2162
3 0.2063
4 0.1875
5 0.1558
6 0.1518
7 0.1502
8 0.1442
9 0.1440
10 0.1384

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1498
2 0.1245
3 0.1121
4 0.1061
5 0.0900
6 0.0863
7 0.0855
8 0.0839
9 0.0816
10 0.0756

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1401
2 0.1350
3 0.1262
4 0.1116
5 0.1019
6 0.1002
7 0.0976
8 0.0976
9 0.0968
10 0.0946


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek