Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,789.9969

Football ohio st 12.8582
Ice Hockey providence 7.9735
Men's Soccer smu 11.4406
Women's Soccer north carolina 12.2707
Women's Volleyball baylor 12.1306
Field Hockey north carolina 12.7413

Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Calvin 1,589.0471 1,570.1760 1,579.5834 63.90 63.22 0.312
2nd Hope 1,547.4742 1,528.6690 1,538.0428 58.54 66.04 0.260
3rd Alma 1,410.5219 1,392.6119 1,401.5383 56.75 55.96 0.113
4th Albion 1,392.4504 1,374.6239 1,383.5085 53.89 52.51 0.097
5th Trine 1,374.1189 1,348.4357 1,361.2168 55.93 52.13 0.074
6th Kalamazoo 1,361.5218 1,348.9356 1,355.2141 51.21 55.88 0.033
7th Olivet 1,359.1891 1,339.2626 1,349.1891 55.57 50.22 0.052
8th Adrian 1,335.8665 1,314.1110 1,324.9441 49.03 56.98 0.047
9th St. Mary's (IN) 1,330.8504 1,312.6184 1,321.7030 20.37 7.37 0.058

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Calvin 0.3637 47.44 11.07 43.48 39.57 3.01 13.50
2nd Hope 0.3100 43.86 12.86 39.65 42.57 3.88 11.64
3rd Alma 0.2482 36.51 11.68 33.46 52.12 3.39 10.25
4th Albion 0.2138 35.12 13.74 32.54 49.98 3.23 10.17
5th St. Mary's (IN) 0.2028 33.57 13.29 31.49 51.94 7.70 23.63
6th Kalamazoo 0.1970 35.23 15.53 32.49 49.26 4.59 9.92
7th Adrian 0.1789 34.11 16.22 31.88 53.98 3.34 9.33
8th Trine 0.1726 35.38 18.11 33.40 48.03 4.19 11.94
9th Olivet 0.1687 31.47 14.59 29.18 52.01 4.39 10.25

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Hope 0.0502 23.53 18.51 22.11 61.92 6.02 6.25
2nd Calvin 0.0521 24.17 18.95 23.34 60.94 6.77 4.95
3rd Trine 0.0989 26.85 16.96 25.16 61.15 4.59 7.95
4th Albion 0.1166 28.22 16.55 26.27 56.29 5.83 4.96
5th Olivet 0.1171 26.97 15.25 25.49 58.33 3.57 6.24
6th Adrian 0.1317 29.85 16.68 27.78 57.53 4.10 8.63
7th Alma 0.1352 29.73 16.21 27.32 56.21 5.60 6.15
8th St. Mary's (IN) 0.1445 29.08 14.63 26.10 60.01 3.45 4.17
9th Kalamazoo 0.1642 32.49 16.08 30.27 53.44 3.15 6.87

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,401.6600 1,387.6648 1,370.1333 1,366.6464 1,381.5261
Difference -13.9952 -31.5267 -35.0136 -26.8451

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Calvin 51 1,035 595 139 148 57.49 7.4 7.0 805 357 58 94 55.65 13.9 8.6
Hope 61 1,155 602 133 123 52.12 8.7 9.4 979 420 88 91 57.10 11.1 10.8
Adrian 54 948 521 85 132 54.96 11.2 7.2 821 381 106 96 53.59 7.7 8.6
Olivet 70 1,565 948 142 110 60.58 11.0 14.2 1,327 701 98 160 47.17 13.5 8.3
Kalamazoo 74 1,158 644 163 91 55.61 7.1 12.7 1,041 513 119 174 50.72 8.7 6.0
Alma 80 1,671 933 140 134 55.84 11.9 12.5 1,542 772 137 173 49.94 11.3 8.9
Albion 77 1,740 937 143 142 53.85 12.2 12.3 1,627 827 107 156 49.17 15.2 10.4
Trine 75 1,129 582 163 144 51.55 6.9 7.8 1,172 625 143 118 46.67 8.2 9.9
St. Mary's (IN) 68 286 49 71 103 17.13 4.0 2.8 2,175 2,125 128 125 2.30 17.0 17.4
Conference Average 68 1,187 646 131 125 51.01 8.9 9.5 1,277 747 109 132 45.81 11.9 9.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn.

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

82.97

2019-10-04 Notre Dame, Ind.
St. Mary's (IN)
Kalamazoo
3
2
26
24
21
25
19
25
25
18
15
9
GAME

73.82

2019-10-02 Notre Dame, Ind.
St. Mary's (IN)
Adrian
3
1
25
15
14
25
25
19
25
17
GAME

67.89

2019-10-12 Notre Dame, Ind.
St. Mary's (IN)
Alma
0
3
23
25
21
25
14
25
GAME

67.48

2019-09-28 Holland, MI
Hope
Calvin
0
3
12
25
22
25
23
25
GAME

65.97

2019-09-21
Trine
Calvin
0
3
21
25
23
25
20
25
GAME

65.61

2019-09-10
Alma
Kalamazoo
3
1
25
10
27
29
28
26
25
21
GAME

64.80

2019-08-31 Adrian, Mich.
Adrian
Albion
2
3
25
17
25
22
23
25
19
25
15
17
GAME

64.67

2019-10-08
Alma
Albion
3
2
25
18
26
28
19
25
25
16
15
10
GAME

64.07

2019-09-24 Kalamazoo, Mich.
Kalamazoo
Olivet
0
3
25
27
23
25
23
25
GAME

63.76

2019-10-11
Albion
Calvin
0
3
21
25
17
25
23
25

HuskerGeek Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 20.7631
2 15.3734
3 14.7983
4 14.7930
5 13.0002
6 12.8956
7 12.4267
8 12.1879
9 10.8637
10 10.5509

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.0211
2 10.8525
3 9.8706
4 7.2736
5 7.1713
6 6.7078
7 6.6370
8 6.3776
9 6.1725
10 6.0370

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.1982
2 10.9837
3 9.9107
4 9.3770
5 9.2745
6 8.7364
7 8.5304
8 8.0594
9 7.4703
10 7.3329

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.3522
2 0.2844
3 0.2263
4 0.2253
5 0.2106
6 0.2069
7 0.2027
8 0.1972
9 0.1883
10 0.1761

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.2624
2 0.1515
3 0.1487
4 0.1399
5 0.1352
6 0.1315
7 0.1165
8 0.1139
9 0.1061
10 0.0978

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1819
2 0.1664
3 0.1612
4 0.1584
5 0.1521
6 0.1358
7 0.1309
8 0.1303
9 0.1285
10 0.1275


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek