Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298

Football ohio st 12.7316
Men's Basketball kansas 12.7368
Women's Basketball south carolina 13.4324
Baseball ucla 12.9478
Softball ucla 10.9838
Ice Hockey north dakota 10.7002
Men's Lacrosse syracuse 7.8562
Women's Lacrosse north carolina 10.7252
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 11.1006
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Calvin 1,630.3422 1,595.7225 1,612.9395 63.42 65.56 0.336
2nd Hope 1,574.1682 1,540.1773 1,557.0800 57.96 67.09 0.249
3rd Alma 1,444.4461 1,410.4624 1,427.3531 56.25 56.87 0.111
4th Albion 1,436.4895 1,401.8488 1,419.0635 54.76 53.60 0.108
5th St. Mary's (IN) 1,406.5644 1,366.8863 1,386.5834 21.89 10.47 0.085
6th Trine 1,404.0603 1,364.9633 1,384.3738 54.25 51.10 0.084
7th Olivet 1,371.5471 1,338.4776 1,354.9114 54.40 50.74 0.051
8th Adrian 1,363.1934 1,327.5992 1,345.2786 49.58 56.52 0.047
9th Kalamazoo 1,342.8348 1,319.2342 1,330.9822 50.12 54.87 0.016

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Calvin 0.3705 47.96 10.90 44.24 39.41 3.25 13.11
2nd Hope 0.2948 42.87 13.39 39.23 43.56 3.75 11.59
3rd Alma 0.2438 36.84 12.46 33.53 51.42 3.64 9.91
4th St. Mary's (IN) 0.2219 34.65 12.46 32.29 51.45 7.45 24.16
5th Albion 0.2183 35.03 13.20 32.35 50.80 3.23 9.94
6th Trine 0.1914 35.94 16.81 33.68 48.37 4.08 11.99
7th Kalamazoo 0.1876 34.19 15.43 31.64 51.20 4.94 9.72
8th Adrian 0.1771 33.71 16.00 31.44 53.83 3.52 10.06
9th Olivet 0.1721 32.14 14.93 29.97 52.29 4.06 10.68

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Calvin 0.0342 22.81 19.38 21.89 62.21 7.01 5.80
2nd Hope 0.0461 23.48 18.87 22.18 62.33 6.33 5.64
3rd Trine 0.1071 27.21 16.49 25.26 60.23 4.15 8.20
4th Albion 0.1101 27.66 16.65 25.75 57.47 6.00 4.93
5th Olivet 0.1213 27.42 15.29 25.76 58.20 3.49 7.14
6th Adrian 0.1301 29.30 16.29 26.78 58.01 4.08 7.52
7th Alma 0.1328 29.96 16.68 27.49 56.09 5.49 5.27
8th St. Mary's (IN) 0.1372 28.68 14.96 26.08 59.55 3.61 3.80
9th Kalamazoo 0.1717 32.22 15.06 30.09 54.40 3.32 7.35

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,424.2851 1,410.6634 1,394.4570 1,396.6736 1,406.5198
Difference -13.6217 -29.8280 -27.6115 -23.6871

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Calvin 85 1,788 1,049 212 227 58.67 8.4 7.9 1,337 568 103 150 57.52 13.0 8.9
Hope 100 2,032 1,097 204 184 53.99 10.0 11.0 1,641 684 131 141 58.32 12.5 11.6
Kalamazoo 101 1,758 968 197 121 55.06 8.9 14.5 1,610 796 176 223 50.56 9.1 7.2
Adrian 69 1,158 608 106 158 52.50 10.9 7.3 1,075 519 130 118 51.72 8.3 9.1
Alma 110 2,321 1,235 179 179 53.21 13.0 13.0 2,215 1,090 170 227 50.79 13.0 9.8
Trine 118 2,164 1,203 253 222 55.59 8.6 9.7 2,014 1,046 234 189 48.06 8.6 10.7
Albion 96 2,155 1,154 167 166 53.55 12.9 13.0 2,015 1,014 131 187 49.68 15.4 10.8
Olivet 98 2,105 1,190 191 161 56.53 11.0 13.1 1,973 1,054 164 197 46.58 12.0 10.0
St. Mary's (IN) 107 514 91 122 165 17.70 4.2 3.1 3,660 3,557 201 199 2.81 18.2 18.4
Conference Average 98 1,777 955 181 176 50.76 9.8 10.3 1,949 1,148 160 181 46.23 12.2 10.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn.

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

83.78

2019-10-04 Notre Dame, Ind.
St. Mary's (IN)
Kalamazoo
3
2
26
24
21
25
19
25
25
18
15
9
GAME

78.11

2019-11-01 Notre Dame, Ind.
St. Mary's (IN)
Trine
3
1
27
25
25
15
21
25
25
23
GAME

75.52

2019-10-02 Notre Dame, Ind.
St. Mary's (IN)
Adrian
3
1
25
15
14
25
25
19
25
17
GAME

72.29

2019-10-22 Notre Dame, Ind.
St. Mary's (IN)
Hope
0
3
23
25
20
25
21
25
GAME

69.71

2019-10-12 Notre Dame, Ind.
St. Mary's (IN)
Alma
0
3
23
25
21
25
14
25
GAME

68.53

2019-09-28 Holland, MI
Hope
Calvin
0
3
12
25
22
25
23
25
GAME

68.13

2019-10-25 Grand Rapids, Mich.
Calvin
Hope
1
3
18
25
18
25
25
11
20
25
GAME

67.44

2019-10-22 Kalamazoo, Mich.
Kalamazoo
Albion
1
3
18
25
25
21
18
25
24
26
GAME

67.10

2019-09-21
Trine
Calvin
0
3
21
25
23
25
20
25
GAME

66.79

2019-11-05
Alma
Albion
1
3
25
20
19
25
23
25
17
25

HuskerGeek Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.1549
2 22.6732
3 20.8071
4 20.4766
5 20.2028
6 19.7406
7 16.9870
8 16.6791
9 16.2074
10 15.9751

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.0295
2 14.4384
3 13.6583
4 13.2947
5 12.5326
6 10.4302
7 9.9224
8 9.3275
9 9.2656
10 8.7510

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.7356
2 14.2397
3 13.9201
4 12.9399
5 12.7165
6 11.9361
7 11.6950
8 11.6429
9 10.6954
10 10.5121

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.3106
2 0.2636
3 0.2187
4 0.2167
5 0.2056
6 0.2023
7 0.1988
8 0.1961
9 0.1955
10 0.1885

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.2333
2 0.1459
3 0.1423
4 0.1402
5 0.1305
6 0.1291
7 0.1244
8 0.1213
9 0.1175
10 0.0965

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1856
2 0.1639
3 0.1515
4 0.1429
5 0.1377
6 0.1235
7 0.1231
8 0.1222
9 0.1182
10 0.1175


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek