Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Pac-12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Stanford 1,860.8527 1,818.6489 1,839.6298 56.13 71.59 0.313
2nd Utah 1,789.8160 1,748.8013 1,769.1898 54.86 65.32 0.226
3rd Washington 1,779.2446 1,741.5780 1,760.3106 52.23 66.52 0.224
4th UCLA 1,757.2008 1,716.1749 1,736.5667 53.89 63.83 0.193
5th Southern California 1,738.4582 1,700.4461 1,719.3471 53.75 61.87 0.196
6th California 1,728.9322 1,698.6450 1,713.7217 52.83 62.06 0.205
7th Washington St. 1,726.8888 1,689.3410 1,708.0117 54.69 59.84 0.162
8th Arizona St. 1,699.9708 1,664.1567 1,681.9684 52.66 61.58 0.146
9th Arizona 1,697.1251 1,663.8855 1,680.4231 50.86 61.83 0.153
10th Oregon 1,693.2866 1,658.9766 1,676.0438 51.57 58.45 0.156
11th Colorado 1,688.3308 1,650.6140 1,669.3659 52.66 59.14 0.136
12th Oregon St. 1,645.8535 1,611.0633 1,628.3655 50.85 56.77 0.084

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Stanford 0.3867 47.81 9.15 44.81 40.11 3.56 7.33
2nd California 0.3433 45.78 11.45 42.67 40.89 4.43 7.04
3rd Utah 0.3415 46.32 12.17 43.04 39.40 5.00 6.78
4th Washington 0.3379 44.91 11.11 41.26 42.31 4.21 7.91
5th UCLA 0.3345 44.98 11.52 42.18 41.85 5.14 7.05
6th Southern California 0.3272 43.61 10.89 40.05 44.68 4.01 7.70
7th Arizona 0.2994 42.17 12.23 38.46 45.05 4.01 5.64
8th Colorado 0.2932 42.33 13.00 38.23 41.92 5.91 6.44
9th Oregon 0.2879 42.21 13.42 39.23 43.68 4.89 8.20
10th Arizona St. 0.2817 39.83 11.65 37.26 46.83 5.13 6.62
11th Washington St. 0.2710 40.45 13.35 36.63 46.75 4.23 7.15
12th Oregon St. 0.2649 40.69 14.20 37.90 44.41 5.42 6.16

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Stanford 0.0739 25.99 18.60 24.60 56.45 9.14 3.17
2nd Washington St. 0.1092 29.21 18.29 26.93 54.38 7.97 3.94
3rd Washington 0.1134 29.85 18.50 27.21 53.94 8.59 4.63
4th Utah 0.1157 29.53 17.97 27.39 52.97 8.52 5.09
5th Southern California 0.1309 30.68 17.59 28.29 51.26 8.48 6.22
6th Oregon 0.1317 29.95 16.77 27.85 54.48 6.82 4.88
7th Arizona St. 0.1357 30.14 16.56 27.67 55.74 6.37 4.60
8th California 0.1380 30.55 16.75 27.38 53.76 6.53 5.00
9th UCLA 0.1413 30.71 16.58 28.56 55.00 7.31 4.44
10th Arizona 0.1460 31.07 16.47 28.87 53.93 6.37 5.48
11th Colorado 0.1575 33.25 17.50 29.65 50.21 7.64 5.83
12th Oregon St. 0.1809 32.59 14.50 30.24 52.53 6.91 4.62

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,715.2453 1,711.4949 1,709.5491 1,706.6731 1,710.7406
Difference -3.7505 -5.6962 -8.5722 -6.0063

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Stanford 120 2,517 1,208 162 255 47.99 15.5 9.9 2,105 765 84 211 63.66 25.1 10.0
Utah 137 2,863 1,416 154 209 49.46 18.6 13.7 2,505 1,059 158 249 57.73 15.9 10.1
Washington 133 2,715 1,256 192 293 46.26 14.1 9.3 2,495 1,022 146 269 59.04 17.1 9.3
Washington St. 123 2,679 1,357 167 240 50.65 16.0 11.2 2,433 1,118 100 251 54.05 24.3 9.7
UCLA 102 2,240 1,050 124 240 46.88 18.1 9.3 2,168 952 109 226 56.09 19.9 9.6
California 113 2,289 1,079 140 181 47.14 16.4 12.6 2,155 967 122 234 55.13 17.7 9.2
Arizona 117 2,388 1,088 112 230 45.56 21.3 10.4 2,346 1,049 146 273 55.29 16.1 8.6
Southern California 132 2,708 1,247 174 312 46.05 15.6 8.7 2,663 1,214 189 269 54.41 14.1 9.9
Arizona St. 125 2,073 952 141 261 45.92 14.7 7.9 2,096 955 140 279 54.44 15.0 7.5
Colorado 106 2,295 1,068 114 190 46.54 20.1 12.1 2,356 1,132 144 252 51.95 16.4 9.3
Oregon 113 2,476 1,138 157 244 45.96 15.8 10.1 2,515 1,204 135 206 52.13 18.6 12.2
Oregon St. 122 2,465 1,116 119 230 45.27 20.7 10.7 2,644 1,325 141 246 49.89 18.8 10.7
Conference Average 120 2,476 1,165 146 240 46.97 17.2 10.5 2,373 1,064 135 247 55.32 18.2 9.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Pac-12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

85.86

2019-10-20
California
Colorado
3
2
25
23
25
22
24
26
25
27
16
14
GAME

85.26

2019-11-01
Utah
Arizona St.
3
2
29
27
23
25
25
21
23
25
15
8
GAME

84.76

2019-10-20 Stanford, Calif.
Stanford
Utah
3
2
25
17
20
25
24
26
25
18
17
15
GAME

84.11

2019-10-27
Southern California
Stanford
2
3
25
23
28
26
19
25
14
25
11
15
GAME

82.89

2019-11-22
Utah
Stanford
1
3
25
23
21
25
23
25
14
25
GAME

82.21

2019-11-07
Southern California
Utah
2
3
19
25
33
31
25
23
24
26
16
18
GAME

82.00

2019-10-18 Seattle, Wash.
Washington
Arizona St.
3
1
20
25
25
20
25
21
25
22
GAME

81.77

2019-10-06
Southern California
Washington St.
2
3
20
25
22
25
28
26
25
16
13
15
GAME

81.75

2019-09-26
California
Stanford
1
3
25
20
17
25
25
27
19
25
GAME

81.67

2019-11-17
Oregon St.
Arizona
2
3
20
25
25
20
23
25
25
23
12
15

HuskerGeek Pac-12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 33.3640
2 30.5564
3 29.1585
4 25.8861
5 25.4313
6 25.2313
7 25.1760
8 24.5974
9 23.7071
10 23.6189

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 23.9131
2 18.7275
3 17.5597
4 17.1823
5 17.1097
6 16.4817
7 14.9491
8 14.9103
9 14.6060
10 14.1900

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.1944
2 17.0316
3 15.9283
4 15.0904
5 15.0618
6 14.8500
7 13.8753
8 13.4467
9 13.1876
10 12.7951

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2691
2 0.2514
3 0.2505
4 0.2485
5 0.2399
6 0.2398
7 0.2395
8 0.2374
9 0.2249
10 0.2222

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1928
2 0.1803
3 0.1672
4 0.1621
5 0.1614
6 0.1475
7 0.1420
8 0.1410
9 0.1402
10 0.1385

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1607
2 0.1445
3 0.1360
4 0.1350
5 0.1314
6 0.1309
7 0.1276
8 0.1217
9 0.1150
10 0.1142


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek