Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,789.9969

Football ohio st 12.8582
Ice Hockey providence 7.9735
Men's Soccer smu 11.4406
Women's Soccer north carolina 12.2707
Women's Volleyball baylor 12.1306
Field Hockey north carolina 12.7413

UAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Emory 1,590.7647 1,562.6953 1,576.6676 59.07 70.83 0.301
2nd Chicago 1,570.1785 1,545.8912 1,557.9875 60.72 65.99 0.283
3rd Carnegie Mellon 1,522.5503 1,501.8432 1,512.1613 60.96 63.99 0.256
4th WashU 1,515.1049 1,490.7810 1,502.8937 55.70 64.66 0.219
5th NYU 1,477.0370 1,451.9153 1,464.4223 56.99 62.21 0.211
6th CWRU 1,442.8199 1,423.7529 1,433.2547 55.46 60.68 0.165
7th Brandeis 1,351.4507 1,326.7702 1,339.0536 56.91 49.60 0.051
8th Rochester (NY) 1,307.2818 1,288.7581 1,297.9869 51.08 51.51 0.026

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Emory 0.3282 45.21 12.39 41.72 40.00 3.53 10.31
2nd WashU 0.3040 43.08 12.67 39.30 43.10 3.38 8.84
3rd Chicago 0.3035 40.20 9.85 36.53 48.19 2.64 11.69
4th Carnegie Mellon 0.2998 41.85 11.87 38.49 45.98 2.76 10.56
5th NYU 0.2674 38.01 11.27 34.87 51.21 1.74 7.40
6th CWRU 0.2637 37.35 10.97 34.50 52.94 2.33 8.59
7th Brandeis 0.1820 32.35 14.15 29.06 53.38 4.49 11.38
8th Rochester (NY) 0.1696 32.97 16.01 30.76 56.38 3.86 12.00

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Chicago 0.0204 19.21 17.16 18.36 66.42 5.37 5.57
2nd Emory 0.0273 23.05 20.32 21.03 61.00 7.05 3.54
3rd Carnegie Mellon 0.0442 24.90 20.48 22.91 57.93 6.40 5.75
4th NYU 0.0562 26.00 20.37 24.16 57.18 7.35 8.37
5th WashU 0.0852 26.36 17.84 24.64 57.86 6.08 6.94
6th CWRU 0.0987 27.94 18.06 25.54 56.97 4.60 7.88
7th Brandeis 0.1312 29.81 16.69 26.93 54.44 5.70 10.29
8th Rochester (NY) 0.1433 30.62 16.30 27.99 55.28 4.69 9.63

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,460.5535 1,468.2955 1,478.1830 1,483.6580 1,472.6725
Difference 7.7421 17.6296 23.1046 16.1587

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Carnegie Mellon 65 1,630 991 137 122 60.80 11.9 13.4 1,160 505 80 124 56.47 14.5 9.4
Emory 58 1,263 651 107 160 51.54 11.8 7.9 993 365 53 138 63.24 18.7 7.2
NYU 77 1,812 980 127 129 54.08 14.3 14.0 1,467 619 128 164 57.81 11.5 8.9
Chicago 64 1,514 801 142 154 52.91 10.7 9.8 1,259 540 84 118 57.11 15.0 10.7
WashU 81 1,840 884 111 146 48.04 16.6 12.6 1,655 702 131 200 57.58 12.6 8.3
CWRU 75 1,562 809 98 71 51.79 15.9 22.0 1,628 862 143 146 47.05 11.4 11.2
Rochester (NY) 83 1,295 623 169 163 48.11 7.7 7.9 1,469 793 182 146 46.02 8.1 10.1
Brandeis 66 1,338 676 133 94 50.52 10.1 14.2 1,480 841 156 104 43.18 9.5 14.2
Conference Average 71 1,532 802 128 130 52.22 12.4 12.7 1,389 653 120 143 53.56 12.7 10.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the UAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

70.14

2019-10-06 Atlanta, GA
Brandeis
CWRU
2
3
16
25
25
23
16
25
25
20
14
16
GAME

69.61

2019-10-06 Atlanta, Ga.
Chicago
Carnegie Mellon
3
1
25
20
23
25
25
17
25
20
GAME

68.11

2019-09-22 St. Louis, MO
Emory
Carnegie Mellon
3
0
25
22
25
20
25
22
GAME

67.43

2019-09-22 Boston, MA
Chicago
WashU
3
0
25
14
25
17
27
25
GAME

66.63

2019-09-21 Waltham, MA
NYU
WashU
0
3
20
25
25
27
29
31
GAME

66.41

2019-10-06 Atlanta, GA
Emory
WashU
3
1
25
12
25
18
12
25
25
21
GAME

65.60

2019-09-21 Boston, MA
Chicago
CWRU
3
0
25
20
25
17
25
18
GAME

64.96

2019-10-06 Atlanta, GA
Emory
NYU
3
1
25
10
25
19
16
25
25
17
GAME

64.67

2019-09-21 Waltham, MA
Chicago
NYU
3
0
25
18
25
19
25
23
GAME

63.94

2019-09-22 Waltham, MA
CWRU
NYU
1
3
18
25
25
15
17
25
18
25

HuskerGeek UAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 17.0088
2 15.5881
3 13.1114
4 12.4504
5 12.4119
6 12.1035
7 11.6581
8 10.7078
9 10.6038
10 10.2489

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.9274
2 7.6328
3 7.6231
4 6.9641
5 6.9586
6 6.0706
7 6.0039
8 5.6491
9 5.3758
10 5.3415

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 9.7256
2 9.5270
3 9.0950
4 9.0110
5 8.6240
6 7.9481
7 7.7571
8 7.3139
9 7.0813
10 6.2670

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2788
2 0.2555
3 0.2041
4 0.1859
5 0.1785
6 0.1720
7 0.1710
8 0.1700
9 0.1660
10 0.1642

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1627
2 0.1142
3 0.1133
4 0.1074
5 0.0991
6 0.0966
7 0.0928
8 0.0920
9 0.0911
10 0.0904

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1671
2 0.1621
3 0.1529
4 0.1414
5 0.1303
6 0.1218
7 0.1197
8 0.1161
9 0.1084
10 0.1063


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek