Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298
BPR D1 NCAAWBB Baylor 0.8231

Football ohio st 12.6975
Men's Basketball kansas 13.0297
Women's Basketball baylor 13.4405
Ice Hockey minnesota st 10.2720
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 10.0755
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

UAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Chicago 1,595.4864 1,558.3250 1,576.7962 60.25 67.25 0.283
2nd Emory 1,583.3285 1,547.7439 1,565.4351 61.39 69.98 0.284
3rd Carnegie Mellon 1,537.0835 1,502.9180 1,519.9048 59.25 63.72 0.230
4th WashU 1,537.9533 1,501.0400 1,519.3845 55.81 65.09 0.227
5th NYU 1,476.9069 1,440.7151 1,458.6988 55.25 62.07 0.194
6th CWRU 1,466.8793 1,432.7378 1,449.7081 54.25 61.40 0.160
7th Rochester (NY) 1,356.7682 1,317.0440 1,336.7586 51.35 52.89 0.040
8th Brandeis 1,353.4546 1,318.3526 1,335.7883 56.04 49.94 0.035

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Emory 0.3362 46.31 12.69 42.58 39.82 3.30 10.02
2nd Chicago 0.3098 41.46 10.48 37.85 46.39 2.92 11.13
3rd WashU 0.3095 43.27 12.32 39.71 43.76 3.02 8.78
4th Carnegie Mellon 0.2920 40.28 11.07 37.08 48.28 2.60 10.09
5th NYU 0.2673 38.55 11.83 35.30 50.83 2.27 7.89
6th CWRU 0.2504 36.38 11.34 33.59 53.05 2.73 8.86
7th Brandeis 0.1787 32.75 14.89 29.63 53.57 4.75 11.43
8th Rochester (NY) 0.1783 33.27 15.44 31.01 54.76 3.42 12.03

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Chicago 0.0272 20.23 17.52 19.43 65.63 5.69 5.41
2nd Emory 0.0527 24.41 19.15 22.44 60.01 6.15 4.02
3rd Carnegie Mellon 0.0621 25.81 19.60 23.65 58.09 6.07 6.14
4th NYU 0.0735 26.92 19.57 25.28 55.90 7.22 8.36
5th WashU 0.0826 25.91 17.66 24.28 58.19 5.64 6.92
6th CWRU 0.0908 26.54 17.46 24.37 58.13 4.38 7.32
7th Rochester (NY) 0.1386 30.47 16.61 27.93 55.33 5.04 9.65
8th Brandeis 0.1432 30.78 16.45 27.93 53.64 5.57 11.24

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,470.3093 1,474.9816 1,486.9240 1,489.0417 1,480.3142
Difference 4.6723 16.6147 18.7324 13.3398

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Emory 110 2,397 1,328 191 268 55.40 12.5 8.9 1,816 690 106 240 62.00 17.1 7.6
Carnegie Mellon 99 2,389 1,363 190 171 57.05 12.6 14.0 1,850 806 128 198 56.43 14.5 9.3
NYU 115 2,545 1,343 197 202 52.77 12.9 12.6 2,139 906 198 247 57.64 10.8 8.7
Chicago 98 2,090 1,066 200 198 51.01 10.5 10.6 1,790 756 129 182 57.77 13.9 9.8
WashU 116 2,506 1,222 170 229 48.76 14.7 10.9 2,220 936 183 281 57.84 12.1 7.9
CWRU 113 2,233 1,131 152 111 50.65 14.7 20.1 2,417 1,310 203 221 45.80 11.9 10.9
Rochester (NY) 109 1,701 810 218 222 47.62 7.8 7.7 1,898 1,005 233 196 47.05 8.1 9.7
Brandeis 92 1,824 905 184 132 49.62 9.9 13.8 2,082 1,186 238 154 43.04 8.7 13.5
Conference Average 107 2,211 1,146 188 192 51.61 12.0 12.3 2,027 949 177 215 53.45 12.1 9.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the UAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.74

2019-10-20 Cleveland, Ohio
Emory
Chicago
1
3
22
25
28
26
23
25
19
25
GAME

70.40

2019-10-06 Atlanta, GA
Brandeis
CWRU
2
3
16
25
25
23
16
25
25
20
14
16
GAME

70.14

2019-10-06 Atlanta, Ga.
Chicago
Carnegie Mellon
3
1
25
20
23
25
25
17
25
20
GAME

68.96

2019-10-20 Cleveland, Ohio
WashU
Carnegie Mellon
3
1
21
25
25
19
25
21
25
15
GAME

68.14

2019-09-22 Boston, MA
Chicago
WashU
3
0
25
14
25
17
27
25
GAME

68.05

2019-09-22 St. Louis, MO
Emory
Carnegie Mellon
3
0
25
22
25
20
25
22
GAME

67.10

2019-10-20 Cleveland, Ohio
Carnegie Mellon
NYU
3
1
25
22
16
25
25
17
26
24
GAME

67.04

2019-10-20 Cleveland, Ohio
Emory
CWRU
3
1
25
18
22
25
25
23
25
21
GAME

66.85

2019-09-21 Waltham, MA
NYU
WashU
0
3
20
25
25
27
29
31
GAME

66.52

2019-10-06 Atlanta, GA
Emory
WashU
3
1
25
12
25
18
12
25
25
21

HuskerGeek UAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 21.4135
2 20.1119
3 18.0900
4 17.2528
5 17.0288
6 16.8597
7 15.8116
8 15.6541
9 14.7071
10 14.5408

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.2191
2 11.2673
3 11.0525
4 9.5680
5 9.3939
6 9.1353
7 8.8020
8 8.7057
9 8.5046
10 7.9189

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.3700
2 12.9602
3 12.7650
4 12.4525
5 11.9720
6 11.4063
7 10.8047
8 9.9365
9 9.9192
10 9.1944

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2580
2 0.2453
3 0.1886
4 0.1841
5 0.1738
6 0.1718
7 0.1707
8 0.1675
9 0.1664
10 0.1649

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1472
2 0.1186
3 0.1077
4 0.1062
5 0.1051
6 0.1043
7 0.0939
8 0.0920
9 0.0868
10 0.0846

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1689
2 0.1581
3 0.1440
4 0.1391
5 0.1251
6 0.1195
7 0.1174
8 0.1164
9 0.1155
10 0.1108


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek