Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

MIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Gust. Adolphus 1,574.6343 1,573.8372 1,574.2357 64.54 58.41 0.257
2nd Augsburg 1,536.0193 1,537.5995 1,536.8092 62.40 55.19 0.222
3rd Bethel (MN) 1,504.9469 1,509.8081 1,507.3756 59.79 56.81 0.214
4th St. Olaf 1,505.7566 1,504.6441 1,505.2002 61.01 54.06 0.179
5th Saint Benedict 1,473.1659 1,473.4287 1,473.2973 60.17 53.20 0.130
6th St. Catherine 1,471.3419 1,468.5474 1,469.9440 57.79 52.15 0.137
7th St. Scholastica 1,423.9121 1,424.4051 1,424.1586 58.61 49.42 0.092
8th Concordia-M'head 1,398.0464 1,394.7996 1,396.4220 57.46 48.07 0.076
9th Macalester 1,386.1541 1,387.8943 1,387.0239 58.30 49.84 0.073
10th Saint Mary's (MN) 1,372.7875 1,376.2129 1,374.4991 55.03 47.11 0.049
11th Hamline 1,342.6720 1,336.8598 1,339.7627 56.32 46.91 0.006
12th Carleton 1,331.4419 1,333.0233 1,332.2324 53.06 49.24 0.038

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Gust. Adolphus 0.3009 40.03 9.93 36.97 42.65 2.93 10.26
2nd Bethel (MN) 0.2849 40.47 11.98 36.80 45.58 3.54 9.30
3rd Augsburg 0.2822 40.30 12.08 36.87 44.34 3.05 10.38
4th St. Olaf 0.2761 39.95 12.34 37.80 42.87 3.67 13.30
5th Saint Benedict 0.2395 37.30 13.34 34.48 44.90 3.71 10.37
6th St. Catherine 0.2269 37.53 14.84 34.20 46.79 3.54 11.53
7th St. Scholastica 0.2154 33.36 11.83 30.87 48.49 2.98 10.03
8th Carleton 0.2058 35.48 14.90 32.33 50.25 3.71 11.04
9th Macalester 0.2025 32.95 12.70 30.56 50.99 3.90 10.32
10th Saint Mary's (MN) 0.2004 33.96 13.91 30.38 51.60 3.17 9.79
11th Concordia-M'head 0.1904 31.70 12.66 28.51 48.51 2.77 10.35
12th Hamline 0.1720 31.33 14.14 27.16 53.83 2.80 12.49

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Gust. Adolphus 0.0437 22.55 18.18 21.14 59.35 5.41 5.19
2nd Augsburg 0.0600 25.54 19.54 23.63 60.02 6.43 5.84
3rd Bethel (MN) 0.0709 25.34 18.25 23.73 60.96 6.29 6.04
4th St. Catherine 0.0896 26.80 17.84 24.29 59.51 5.85 5.21
5th St. Olaf 0.0969 26.01 16.31 24.11 60.38 4.14 6.65
6th Saint Benedict 0.1092 26.35 15.42 23.94 58.14 3.64 3.90
7th Concordia-M'head 0.1144 26.31 14.87 24.06 54.51 4.02 5.59
8th St. Scholastica 0.1231 27.34 15.02 25.03 57.14 3.58 6.43
9th Macalester 0.1295 29.51 16.56 27.04 54.60 4.17 7.50
10th Saint Mary's (MN) 0.1516 30.33 15.17 27.30 59.68 4.00 6.37
11th Hamline 0.1658 32.26 15.68 29.47 53.61 4.13 8.62
12th Carleton 0.1676 33.35 16.59 30.11 50.96 5.16 8.67

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,443.4134 1,441.4493 1,442.2401 1,442.6743 1,442.4443
Difference -1.9641 -1.1733 -0.7390 -1.2922

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Gust. Adolphus 108 2,527 1,472 179 191 58.25 14.1 13.2 2,146 1,037 144 169 51.68 14.9 12.7
Augsburg 89 2,022 1,155 150 130 57.12 13.5 15.6 1,762 900 124 150 48.92 14.2 11.7
Bethel (MN) 97 2,156 1,147 128 182 53.20 16.8 11.8 2,046 1,031 158 150 49.61 12.9 13.6
Macalester 103 2,197 1,229 181 195 55.94 12.1 11.3 2,194 1,194 186 202 45.58 11.8 10.9
Saint Benedict 100 2,066 1,113 158 137 53.87 13.1 15.1 2,045 1,082 114 161 47.09 17.9 12.7
St. Olaf 118 2,288 1,231 252 235 53.80 9.1 9.7 2,259 1,194 207 213 47.15 10.9 10.6
St. Catherine 99 2,202 1,179 198 219 53.54 11.1 10.1 2,073 1,105 139 183 46.70 14.9 11.3
St. Scholastica 89 1,825 980 136 95 53.70 13.4 19.2 1,860 1,020 146 165 45.16 12.7 11.3
Concordia-M'head 79 1,558 831 135 123 53.34 11.5 12.7 1,661 958 128 144 42.32 13.0 11.5
Carleton 81 1,635 832 145 163 50.89 11.3 10.0 1,801 1,000 174 136 44.48 10.4 13.2
Saint Mary's (MN) 99 1,724 900 175 178 52.20 9.9 9.7 1,817 1,038 168 175 42.87 10.8 10.4
Hamline 99 1,851 977 199 173 52.78 9.3 10.7 2,155 1,257 221 187 41.67 9.8 11.5
Conference Average 97 2,004 1,087 170 168 54.05 12.1 12.4 1,985 1,068 159 170 46.10 12.9 11.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the MIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.77

2022-10-14
St. Olaf
Bethel (MN)
3
2
25
22
20
25
25
22
21
25
15
9
GAME

72.17

2022-11-05
Gust. Adolphus
St. Olaf
3
2
26
24
25
20
18
25
24
26
15
9
GAME

72.11

2022-10-08
St. Olaf
Gust. Adolphus
2
3
25
18
25
17
21
25
26
28
11
15
GAME

70.88

2022-10-21
Saint Benedict
St. Olaf
1
3
23
25
27
25
23
25
22
25
GAME

70.61

2022-10-07
Augsburg
Gust. Adolphus
1
3
22
25
18
25
25
23
17
25
GAME

70.53

2022-10-01
Gust. Adolphus
Bethel (MN)
3
1
25
22
25
22
23
25
25
18
GAME

70.51

2022-10-15
St. Olaf
Augsburg
0
3
22
25
23
25
30
32
GAME

70.39

2022-10-14
Macalester
Augsburg
3
2
23
25
17
25
25
22
25
20
15
10
GAME

70.11

2022-10-14
Saint Mary's (MN)
Saint Benedict
2
3
25
16
25
27
22
25
26
24
14
16
GAME

69.80

2022-10-22
Concordia-M'head
Gust. Adolphus
1
3
27
29
25
23
13
25
13
25

HuskerGeek MIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.2317
2 22.0831
3 20.7017
4 20.3767
5 19.6269
6 18.1973
7 17.7440
8 17.2937
9 17.1529
10 17.1198

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.8228
2 12.3918
3 11.9466
4 11.3913
5 10.6001
6 10.2028
7 9.6510
8 9.4644
9 9.4350
10 9.1304

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.7827
2 16.2429
3 16.0204
4 15.3893
5 14.6174
6 14.5521
7 12.0335
8 11.8087
9 11.3089
10 11.2103

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2277
2 0.2202
3 0.2180
4 0.2168
5 0.2042
6 0.2008
7 0.1971
8 0.1888
9 0.1876
10 0.1817

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1528
2 0.1271
3 0.1262
4 0.1215
5 0.1085
6 0.1055
7 0.1051
8 0.1003
9 0.0941
10 0.0921

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1811
2 0.1730
3 0.1635
4 0.1563
5 0.1555
6 0.1548
7 0.1536
8 0.1504
9 0.1163
10 0.1146


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek