Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Southern - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Samford 1,482.4877 1,461.1814 1,471.7960 41.81 64.57 0.077
2nd Furman 1,451.6084 1,436.6007 1,444.0850 44.38 61.92 0.061
3rd Ga. Southern 1,442.0569 1,424.1054 1,433.0530 43.48 60.48 0.041
4th Appalachian St. 1,444.7037 1,419.1319 1,431.8607 43.76 59.55 0.049
5th Col. of Charleston 1,431.3132 1,430.0211 1,430.6670 43.86 58.32 0.021
6th Davidson 1,354.3114 1,330.8945 1,342.5519 39.17 56.94 -0.028
7th Elon 1,353.5852 1,328.0740 1,340.7689 38.52 56.57 -0.038
8th Western Caro. 1,292.3406 1,299.7538 1,296.0419 37.73 53.19 -0.069
9th UNCG 1,291.9235 1,288.0565 1,289.9885 36.40 54.00 -0.101
10th Wofford 1,298.5680 1,273.7343 1,286.0912 38.34 51.75 -0.076
11th Chattanooga 1,264.1256 1,248.5718 1,256.3246 37.24 50.74 -0.125
12th The Citadel 1,185.7674 1,179.4689 1,182.6139 36.96 45.26 -0.175

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Samford 0.2694 41.20 14.26 37.74 45.09 4.74 5.17
2nd Ga. Southern 0.2389 37.37 13.49 34.63 48.25 4.24 5.38
3rd Furman 0.2316 37.29 14.13 35.34 49.15 5.61 5.10
4th Appalachian St. 0.2278 38.20 15.43 35.93 47.28 6.32 4.74
5th Col. of Charleston 0.2075 35.81 15.06 33.76 49.41 5.83 4.19
6th Davidson 0.1984 34.50 14.66 31.74 52.32 5.25 4.45
7th Elon 0.1775 33.35 15.60 31.34 52.48 5.47 4.51
8th Wofford 0.1695 31.97 15.02 28.96 55.56 5.52 4.88
9th Western Caro. 0.1543 28.65 13.22 26.63 59.74 4.40 6.07
10th UNCG 0.1539 33.04 17.65 31.05 53.59 5.19 4.37
11th Chattanooga 0.1248 30.14 17.66 28.13 54.28 6.79 5.93
12th The Citadel 0.1089 31.22 20.33 27.92 51.00 7.27 5.03

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Furman 0.1705 32.62 15.56 30.26 54.55 5.89 4.10
2nd Appalachian St. 0.1789 34.34 16.46 32.09 51.75 5.64 5.72
3rd Col. of Charleston 0.1867 34.19 15.52 31.34 51.32 5.68 5.05
4th Samford 0.1923 35.44 16.21 33.00 50.54 6.30 4.73
5th Ga. Southern 0.1984 34.08 14.24 30.63 50.70 4.52 5.25
6th Elon 0.2151 36.76 15.25 34.05 46.45 5.08 4.55
7th Western Caro. 0.2231 36.69 14.38 33.84 49.15 4.41 7.24
8th Davidson 0.2261 37.46 14.85 35.00 49.31 4.46 4.58
9th Wofford 0.2460 39.59 14.99 36.23 45.43 5.62 8.16
10th Chattanooga 0.2496 38.61 13.65 35.46 48.37 4.21 6.59
11th UNCG 0.2553 38.85 13.33 36.38 48.10 4.94 5.58
12th The Citadel 0.2838 43.32 14.95 39.12 41.07 4.90 9.04

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,350.4869 1,355.1433 1,356.3779 1,355.3131 1,354.3303
Difference 4.6564 5.8910 4.8263 5.1245

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Samford 121 2,852 1,283 166 310 44.99 17.2 9.2 2,407 816 108 236 66.10 22.3 10.2
Furman 100 2,309 1,063 130 157 46.04 17.8 14.7 2,037 780 81 150 61.71 25.1 13.6
Appalachian St. 121 2,782 1,247 136 209 44.82 20.5 13.3 2,574 1,031 144 192 59.95 17.9 13.4
Ga. Southern 122 2,751 1,224 154 223 44.49 17.9 12.3 2,561 1,020 129 215 60.17 19.9 11.9
Col. of Charleston 133 2,975 1,353 138 175 45.48 21.6 17.0 2,797 1,149 136 236 58.92 20.6 11.9
Davidson 106 2,103 911 131 175 43.32 16.1 12.0 2,022 834 95 178 58.75 21.3 11.4
Elon 119 2,560 1,094 148 253 42.73 17.3 10.1 2,523 1,041 111 195 58.74 22.7 12.9
Wofford 115 2,516 1,148 165 262 45.63 15.2 9.6 2,446 1,089 190 238 55.48 12.9 10.3
UNCG 118 2,366 983 141 185 41.55 16.8 12.8 2,434 1,048 140 258 56.94 17.4 9.4
Western Caro. 117 2,419 981 165 225 40.55 14.7 10.8 2,641 1,211 183 229 54.15 14.4 11.5
The Citadel 104 2,025 872 132 158 43.06 15.3 12.8 2,328 1,190 201 199 48.88 11.6 11.7
Chattanooga 113 2,325 921 149 229 39.61 15.6 10.2 2,637 1,259 163 211 52.26 16.2 12.5
Conference Average 116 2,499 1,090 146 213 43.52 17.2 12.1 2,451 1,039 140 211 57.67 18.5 11.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Southern

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.99

2011-11-20 Birmingham, Ala.
Appalachian St.
Col. of Charleston
1
3
24
26
25
21
22
25
25
27
GAME

68.93

2011-10-28 Statesboro, Ga.
Ga. Southern
Col. of Charleston
2
3
20
25
25
20
24
26
25
16
12
15
GAME

68.69

2011-10-22 Statesboro, Ga.
Ga. Southern
Samford
1
3
29
31
16
25
25
23
23
25
GAME

68.49

2011-10-08 Statesboro, Ga.
Ga. Southern
Appalachian St.
1
3
24
26
23
25
25
17
23
25
GAME

68.30

2011-11-19 Birmingham, Ala.
Davidson
Samford
1
3
22
25
25
22
22
25
22
25
GAME

67.37

2011-10-29 Davidson, N.C.
Davidson
Col. of Charleston
2
3
25
23
17
25
29
31
25
22
11
15
GAME

66.71

2011-11-08 Cullowhee, N.C.
Western Caro.
Appalachian St.
3
1
25
19
23
25
25
23
25
22
GAME

66.42

2011-10-07 Greenville, S.C.
Furman
Col. of Charleston
3
1
22
25
25
21
25
23
25
6
GAME

66.32

2011-11-11 Greenville, S.C.
Furman
Ga. Southern
3
1
25
21
25
21
12
25
25
20
GAME

66.26

2011-10-08 Birmingham, Ala.
Samford
Elon
3
1
25
20
25
27
27
25
25
12

HuskerGeek Southern All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.6631
2 23.8606
3 22.8823
4 21.1852
5 20.8427
6 20.6403
7 20.3573
8 19.9805
9 19.5296
10 19.4612

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.7349
2 15.9327
3 12.6865
4 12.5779
5 12.5293
6 12.5241
7 12.4748
8 12.4384
9 12.3896
10 12.3097

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.1510
2 20.0357
3 16.4579
4 15.5454
5 14.4606
6 14.2963
7 14.1709
8 13.7793
9 13.6679
10 12.7182

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2126
2 0.2119
3 0.2038
4 0.1956
5 0.1953
6 0.1923
7 0.1910
8 0.1738
9 0.1723
10 0.1687

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1406
2 0.1325
3 0.1306
4 0.1216
5 0.1172
6 0.1103
7 0.1099
8 0.1094
9 0.1081
10 0.1044

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1665
2 0.1506
3 0.1489
4 0.1483
5 0.1435
6 0.1360
7 0.1285
8 0.1272
9 0.1247
10 0.1189


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek