Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Lone Star - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st West Tex. A&M 1,619.4459 1,606.0929 1,612.7556 55.19 68.93 0.227
2nd Angelo St. 1,596.5702 1,580.3426 1,588.4357 56.65 65.40 0.181
3rd Texas Woman's 1,556.9796 1,537.4650 1,547.1915 52.39 64.75 0.157
4th Tex. A&M-Commerce 1,519.6203 1,499.6462 1,509.6002 50.06 62.63 0.117
5th Tarleton St. 1,515.2143 1,486.3655 1,500.7206 50.63 62.18 0.102
6th Midwestern St. 1,472.6592 1,451.7847 1,462.1847 48.76 59.39 0.090
7th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 1,444.0422 1,412.8623 1,428.3672 46.04 58.78 0.039
8th Eastern N.M. 1,436.3953 1,412.0607 1,424.1760 47.05 56.55 0.014
9th Cameron 1,410.0595 1,384.3190 1,397.1300 43.43 57.26 -0.007

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st West Tex. A&M 0.3041 42.20 11.79 39.25 45.28 3.74 6.18
2nd Tex. A&M-Commerce 0.2558 39.85 14.27 36.66 45.75 4.05 7.38
3rd Texas Woman's 0.2551 38.63 13.12 35.60 48.27 3.74 6.36
4th Angelo St. 0.2500 37.16 12.16 34.31 48.20 4.23 7.55
5th Tarleton St. 0.2318 36.55 13.37 34.00 50.17 3.44 5.46
6th Midwestern St. 0.2127 36.04 14.77 32.98 49.93 4.98 6.33
7th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 0.2100 37.49 16.49 34.44 48.17 4.12 7.18
8th Cameron 0.1675 33.32 16.57 30.51 51.62 5.15 7.03
9th Eastern N.M. 0.1638 31.89 15.51 29.19 52.58 6.19 6.94

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Angelo St. 0.0690 23.64 16.74 21.90 63.98 5.30 2.96
2nd West Tex. A&M 0.0769 27.83 20.13 26.48 56.05 8.03 2.70
3rd Texas Woman's 0.0980 28.11 18.32 26.63 56.20 7.54 3.61
4th Midwestern St. 0.1230 29.50 17.20 28.05 56.57 5.99 5.56
5th Tarleton St. 0.1300 29.05 16.05 27.72 56.83 4.95 4.30
6th Tex. A&M-Commerce 0.1386 29.86 16.01 27.21 56.45 5.48 6.04
7th Eastern N.M. 0.1494 31.92 16.98 29.81 52.48 6.03 4.34
8th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 0.1710 32.94 15.84 30.87 52.79 5.32 5.47
9th Cameron 0.1748 33.39 15.91 31.21 54.68 4.88 5.13

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,496.7290 1,494.3823 1,489.6128 1,490.8352 1,492.8898
Difference -2.3468 -7.1162 -5.8939 -5.1189

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
West Tex. A&M 137 3,211 1,610 150 143 50.14 21.4 22.5 2,615 974 84 158 62.75 31.1 16.6
Angelo St. 128 2,897 1,442 162 155 49.78 17.9 18.7 2,532 1,061 83 122 58.10 30.5 20.8
Tex. A&M-Commerce 124 2,025 962 172 184 47.51 11.8 11.0 1,864 785 142 139 57.89 13.1 13.4
Texas Woman's 123 2,461 1,157 123 118 47.01 20.0 20.9 2,266 950 102 152 58.08 22.2 14.9
Tarleton St. 108 2,210 1,006 95 116 45.52 23.3 19.1 2,135 932 107 150 56.35 20.0 14.2
Midwestern St. 111 2,368 1,075 117 158 45.40 20.2 15.0 2,394 1,094 141 154 54.30 17.0 15.5
Tex. A&M-Kingsville 117 2,316 998 141 166 43.09 16.4 14.0 2,414 1,102 148 175 54.35 16.3 13.8
Eastern N.M. 101 2,037 860 111 132 42.22 18.4 15.4 2,268 1,106 105 164 51.24 21.6 13.8
Cameron 108 2,214 889 132 166 40.15 16.8 13.3 2,472 1,165 140 182 52.87 17.7 13.6
Conference Average 117 2,415 1,111 134 149 45.65 18.5 16.6 2,329 1,019 117 155 56.21 21.1 15.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Lone Star

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.77

2013-10-18 San Angelo, TX
Angelo St.
Tex. A&M-Commerce
3
2
20
25
22
25
27
25
25
21
15
10
GAME

75.64

2013-10-05 San Angelo, TX
Angelo St.
West Tex. A&M
1
3
22
25
23
25
25
20
15
25
GAME

75.54

2013-11-23 Canyon, TX
West Tex. A&M
Angelo St.
3
2
16
25
25
21
15
25
25
21
16
14
GAME

74.89

2013-09-20 San Angelo, TX
Angelo St.
Midwestern St.
3
2
25
18
24
26
19
25
25
22
15
12
GAME

74.01

2013-11-08 Canyon, TX
West Tex. A&M
Angelo St.
3
0
25
20
25
23
25
22
GAME

73.77

2013-10-09 Commerce, Texas
Tex. A&M-Commerce
Angelo St.
3
1
25
22
20
25
25
15
25
17
GAME

73.65

2013-10-18 Stephenville, TX
Tarleton St.
Texas Woman's
2
3
25
23
26
28
29
27
16
25
9
15
GAME

72.91

2013-11-16 Stephenville, TX
Tarleton St.
Angelo St.
3
2
18
25
19
25
25
19
25
21
15
11
GAME

72.73

2013-11-22 Canyon, TX
West Tex. A&M
Tex. A&M-Commerce
3
2
21
25
25
21
25
27
25
19
15
13
GAME

71.74

2013-10-19 Stephenville, TX
Tarleton St.
Tex. A&M-Commerce
3
2
26
28
22
25
25
17
25
21
15
8

HuskerGeek Lone Star All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.5593
2 26.5927
3 25.7055
4 24.4689
5 20.6089
6 20.5751
7 20.3674
8 19.5916
9 18.4629
10 18.2462

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.0143
2 16.5970
3 14.8938
4 13.1584
5 12.6124
6 12.5671
7 12.3845
8 11.6487
9 10.2735
10 10.0400

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.0232
2 16.8904
3 16.7791
4 15.8361
5 14.5107
6 14.0940
7 14.0568
8 12.8735
9 12.1678
10 12.0350

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2376
2 0.2158
3 0.2127
4 0.2037
5 0.2001
6 0.1876
7 0.1825
8 0.1822
9 0.1775
10 0.1649

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1446
2 0.1328
3 0.1316
4 0.1315
5 0.0975
6 0.0954
7 0.0951
8 0.0927
9 0.0921
10 0.0917

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1689
2 0.1661
3 0.1408
4 0.1307
5 0.1305
6 0.1168
7 0.1159
8 0.1156
9 0.1146
10 0.1086


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek