Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Lone Star - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st West Tex. A&M 1,668.9262 1,667.0849 1,668.0053 60.78 59.86 0.249
2nd DBU 1,591.4775 1,593.1019 1,592.2895 58.13 54.67 0.190
3rd UT Tyler 1,587.7173 1,587.5305 1,587.6239 76.35 75.47 0.132
4th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 1,574.5068 1,568.4604 1,571.4807 55.39 55.04 0.132
5th Ark.-Fort Smith 1,547.6474 1,545.4339 1,546.5403 55.08 54.15 0.108
6th Tex. A&M Int'l 1,538.5575 1,535.8179 1,537.1871 55.02 54.98 0.103
7th Lubbock Christian 1,513.6865 1,516.6343 1,515.1597 54.85 54.34 0.086
8th St. Mary's (TX) 1,510.1560 1,507.2556 1,508.7051 57.54 48.65 0.058
9th Eastern N.M. 1,497.9293 1,497.1366 1,497.5329 56.53 48.21 0.089
10th Texas Woman's 1,491.4634 1,490.8424 1,491.1529 51.60 50.61 0.056
11th Tex. Permian Basin 1,484.6306 1,485.6782 1,485.1543 56.46 47.45 0.055
12th Angelo St. 1,475.5689 1,478.7315 1,477.1493 52.79 50.81 0.079
13th St. Edward's 1,468.9078 1,466.8759 1,467.8915 54.74 49.29 0.068
14th Okla. Christian 1,458.3163 1,464.0982 1,461.2044 55.21 50.13 0.066
15th Midwestern St. 1,430.3691 1,425.7020 1,428.0336 51.27 47.56 0.004
16th Cameron 1,383.7207 1,381.5929 1,382.6564 53.05 44.21 -0.017
17th Western N.M. 1,371.7217 1,375.2975 1,373.5084 50.29 45.41 -0.045

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st UT Tyler 0.3320 39.80 6.60 36.90 42.74 4.90 8.12
2nd West Tex. A&M 0.3205 44.13 12.08 40.49 42.94 3.93 7.88
3rd DBU 0.3125 46.21 14.96 41.77 37.92 4.56 9.95
4th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 0.2607 39.01 12.94 36.10 47.79 4.72 6.97
5th Tex. A&M Int'l 0.2458 37.60 13.02 34.90 47.90 4.85 6.92
6th Ark.-Fort Smith 0.2402 36.65 12.62 33.97 49.80 4.11 8.37
7th Lubbock Christian 0.2338 36.93 13.55 34.29 47.79 6.38 7.30
8th Texas Woman's 0.2251 36.78 14.27 33.92 49.06 3.80 7.86
9th Angelo St. 0.2196 36.47 14.51 34.40 47.82 5.25 6.67
10th Eastern N.M. 0.2083 36.47 15.64 33.40 48.04 4.59 8.26
11th St. Edward's 0.2074 33.28 12.54 30.51 54.36 3.67 7.14
12th Okla. Christian 0.2064 34.67 14.03 32.24 52.48 4.91 7.51
13th St. Mary's (TX) 0.2034 35.02 14.68 32.32 51.47 4.25 9.54
14th Tex. Permian Basin 0.1911 33.17 14.06 29.69 50.84 3.63 8.37
15th Midwestern St. 0.1870 34.83 16.13 32.75 48.51 5.30 6.46
16th Western N.M. 0.1589 33.15 17.26 30.41 52.67 6.18 7.62
17th Cameron 0.1542 29.10 13.68 26.57 57.42 4.00 8.95

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st West Tex. A&M 0.0719 25.83 18.64 24.16 58.30 7.25 3.05
2nd Eastern N.M. 0.1197 28.28 16.31 26.13 53.20 6.22 6.26
3rd DBU 0.1222 29.75 17.53 26.86 55.74 5.97 7.48
4th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 0.1284 28.36 15.53 25.85 58.26 5.21 4.69
5th Ark.-Fort Smith 0.1321 28.76 15.55 27.18 58.25 5.08 6.27
6th Tex. Permian Basin 0.1359 29.67 16.08 25.69 52.15 5.45 5.98
7th St. Edward's 0.1390 29.77 15.87 27.58 55.42 6.48 6.68
8th Angelo St. 0.1408 30.19 16.12 27.75 55.44 6.51 6.04
9th Okla. Christian 0.1409 30.92 16.84 28.75 53.90 6.31 6.43
10th Tex. A&M Int'l 0.1430 29.58 15.28 27.62 55.97 4.86 4.43
11th St. Mary's (TX) 0.1454 30.98 16.44 28.56 54.26 5.97 6.68
12th Lubbock Christian 0.1473 31.79 17.05 29.57 52.28 5.80 7.24
13th Texas Woman's 0.1689 32.78 15.88 29.95 53.31 6.28 5.77
14th Cameron 0.1714 32.42 15.28 29.72 50.05 6.48 7.85
15th Midwestern St. 0.1830 32.47 14.17 29.89 54.19 3.84 6.40
16th UT Tyler 0.1995 27.71 7.76 25.47 55.59 5.59 5.61
17th Western N.M. 0.2036 34.23 13.87 31.33 52.87 4.62 6.05

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,505.3691 1,503.3175 1,505.7551 1,505.3780 1,504.9549
Difference -2.0517 0.3859 0.0089 -0.5523

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
West Tex. A&M 128 2,779 1,549 195 184 55.74 14.3 15.1 2,263 1,025 100 192 54.71 22.6 11.8
Tex. A&M Int'l 115 2,409 1,299 153 171 53.92 15.7 14.1 2,173 1,043 121 180 52.00 18.0 12.1
DBU 114 2,516 1,383 224 251 54.97 11.2 10.0 2,205 1,096 182 195 50.30 12.1 11.3
Tex. A&M-Kingsville 112 2,307 1,226 138 194 53.14 16.7 11.9 2,105 1,019 120 183 51.59 17.5 11.5
Ark.-Fort Smith 115 2,556 1,341 189 203 52.47 13.5 12.6 2,438 1,213 174 175 50.25 14.0 13.9
Lubbock Christian 100 2,047 1,068 126 113 52.17 16.2 18.1 2,049 1,021 168 146 50.17 12.2 14.0
Okla. Christian 110 2,344 1,264 150 162 53.93 15.6 14.5 2,412 1,281 164 175 46.89 14.7 13.8
St. Mary's (TX) 102 1,955 1,073 169 134 54.89 11.6 14.6 2,010 1,110 151 159 44.78 13.3 12.6
Eastern N.M. 102 1,994 1,087 151 133 54.51 13.2 15.0 1,976 1,093 136 155 44.69 14.5 12.7
St. Edward's 106 2,050 1,076 127 188 52.49 16.1 10.9 2,134 1,155 158 166 45.88 13.5 12.9
Texas Woman's 107 2,191 1,107 156 186 50.53 14.0 11.8 2,175 1,138 135 189 47.68 16.1 11.5
Tex. Permian Basin 99 2,121 1,156 153 156 54.50 13.9 13.6 2,185 1,234 145 158 43.52 15.1 13.8
Angelo St. 108 2,216 1,084 113 173 48.92 19.6 12.8 2,371 1,275 152 154 46.23 15.6 15.4
Cameron 110 2,192 1,149 174 220 52.42 12.6 10.0 2,530 1,472 196 238 41.82 12.9 10.6
Midwestern St. 105 2,141 1,061 116 151 49.56 18.5 14.2 2,417 1,344 164 142 44.39 14.7 17.0
Western N.M. 101 1,978 957 126 222 48.38 15.7 8.9 2,377 1,373 155 200 42.24 15.3 11.9
Conference Average 108 2,237 1,180 154 178 52.66 14.9 13.0 2,239 1,181 151 175 47.32 15.1 12.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Lone Star

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.55

2022-11-05
Texas Woman's
Ark.-Fort Smith
3
2
27
29
26
24
18
25
25
22
15
12
GAME

75.99

2022-09-16
Texas Woman's
St. Mary's (TX)
3
2
29
27
26
28
28
26
12
25
15
3
GAME

75.85

2022-09-10 Austin, TX
Eastern N.M.
Tex. A&M-Kingsville
3
2
26
28
26
24
24
26
27
25
15
11
GAME

75.71

2022-10-29
Okla. Christian
Angelo St.
3
2
25
27
24
26
25
23
25
20
20
18
GAME

75.52

2022-10-21
Angelo St.
Tex. A&M-Kingsville
2
3
20
25
25
23
25
23
20
25
12
15
GAME

74.39

2022-10-22
St. Mary's (TX)
Ark.-Fort Smith
3
1
25
19
26
28
25
20
27
25
GAME

74.07

2022-10-01
Tex. A&M Int'l
Ark.-Fort Smith
3
1
29
27
22
25
25
15
25
20
GAME

73.99

2022-11-10 Canyon, TX
DBU
Ark.-Fort Smith
3
2
25
23
25
15
19
25
22
25
16
14
GAME

73.40

2022-09-09 Austin, TX
Tex. A&M-Kingsville
Okla. Christian
1
3
20
25
25
19
25
27
21
25
GAME

73.31

2022-10-05
Lubbock Christian
Texas Woman's
3
2
26
24
25
22
23
25
13
25
15
12

HuskerGeek Lone Star All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.9472
2 22.8545
3 22.0695
4 21.3446
5 20.6833
6 20.3624
7 20.2449
8 20.0938
9 20.0493
10 19.6968

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.4556
2 12.9725
3 12.9362
4 12.7486
5 12.7019
6 11.8980
7 11.3080
8 11.2285
9 10.7394
10 10.6141

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.0988
2 18.7690
3 16.6897
4 14.9606
5 14.6072
6 14.3940
7 13.9823
8 13.8115
9 13.5849
10 13.3110

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2241
2 0.2238
3 0.2207
4 0.2155
5 0.2036
6 0.1995
7 0.1970
8 0.1910
9 0.1843
10 0.1838

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1323
2 0.1212
3 0.1191
4 0.1176
5 0.1160
6 0.1131
7 0.1123
8 0.1122
9 0.1096
10 0.1041

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1910
2 0.1721
3 0.1691
4 0.1511
5 0.1469
6 0.1412
7 0.1391
8 0.1386
9 0.1370
10 0.1365


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek