Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Lone Star - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Angelo St. 1,582.2194 1,602.5796 1,592.3670 52.03 66.47 0.163
2nd Texas Woman's 1,558.0094 1,582.3933 1,570.1541 52.52 64.01 0.148
3rd Tarleton St. 1,556.0632 1,570.8100 1,563.4192 50.95 64.63 0.150
4th West Tex. A&M 1,489.5325 1,513.9158 1,501.6747 47.03 62.06 0.096
5th Cameron 1,484.0250 1,481.3496 1,482.6867 49.57 59.15 0.074
6th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 1,474.3446 1,481.5302 1,477.9331 47.68 59.62 0.064
7th Eastern N.M. 1,458.0359 1,472.4317 1,465.2161 46.06 58.89 0.040
8th Tex. A&M-Commerce 1,444.5767 1,451.5722 1,448.0703 46.08 56.95 0.031
9th Midwestern St. 1,399.6212 1,418.9685 1,409.2616 42.08 56.27 -0.014

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Angelo St. 0.2713 39.94 12.81 37.41 46.10 4.62 6.05
2nd Tarleton St. 0.2564 42.36 16.72 40.13 42.78 5.64 6.07
3rd Texas Woman's 0.2543 36.20 10.77 32.95 53.52 3.64 6.98
4th West Tex. A&M 0.2369 37.29 13.60 34.71 50.32 4.49 5.40
5th Cameron 0.2153 34.53 13.00 31.67 52.58 4.36 6.03
6th Eastern N.M. 0.2104 38.73 17.69 35.95 43.23 6.16 7.54
7th Tex. A&M-Commerce 0.2007 36.18 16.11 33.41 47.64 4.76 6.45
8th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 0.2007 36.34 16.28 33.91 49.25 5.15 6.73
9th Midwestern St. 0.1561 31.43 15.82 29.24 53.45 4.93 6.25

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Tarleton St. 0.1060 28.74 18.15 27.31 54.57 7.67 4.55
2nd Texas Woman's 0.1068 28.20 17.52 26.60 55.79 5.54 5.45
3rd Angelo St. 0.1082 26.33 15.51 24.44 60.20 4.61 4.03
4th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 0.1368 29.54 15.86 26.92 56.60 5.45 5.12
5th West Tex. A&M 0.1410 31.11 17.00 28.88 54.27 6.56 4.53
6th Cameron 0.1412 28.78 14.65 26.96 57.01 4.17 4.84
7th Tex. A&M-Commerce 0.1699 31.73 14.74 29.01 53.83 4.79 7.35
8th Midwestern St. 0.1700 31.67 14.67 29.36 54.62 4.62 4.55
9th Eastern N.M. 0.1705 33.34 16.29 31.04 50.97 5.51 5.47

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,501.1981 1,501.3077 1,498.1859 1,487.4315 1,497.0308
Difference 0.1097 -3.0121 -13.7666 -5.5564

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Angelo St. 145 3,348 1,603 161 206 47.88 20.8 16.3 2,879 1,104 128 181 61.65 22.5 15.9
Texas Woman's 111 2,493 1,228 151 131 49.26 16.5 19.0 2,150 865 123 175 59.77 17.5 12.3
Tarleton St. 127 2,945 1,399 145 191 47.50 20.3 15.4 2,621 1,043 126 175 60.21 20.8 15.0
Tex. A&M-Kingsville 123 2,729 1,254 171 182 45.95 16.0 15.0 2,634 1,153 139 179 56.23 18.9 14.7
Cameron 106 2,280 1,054 113 108 46.23 20.2 21.1 2,233 1,000 117 188 55.22 19.1 11.9
West Tex. A&M 117 2,522 1,085 109 149 43.02 23.1 16.9 2,500 1,072 120 152 57.12 20.8 16.4
Eastern N.M. 122 2,574 1,103 168 218 42.85 15.3 11.8 2,666 1,207 149 191 54.73 17.9 14.0
Tex. A&M-Commerce 107 2,276 991 128 173 43.54 17.8 13.2 2,413 1,127 181 181 53.30 13.3 13.3
Midwestern St. 114 2,316 897 121 224 38.73 19.1 10.3 2,660 1,269 130 165 52.29 20.5 16.1
Conference Average 119 2,609 1,179 141 176 45.00 18.8 15.4 2,528 1,093 135 176 56.72 19.0 14.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Lone Star

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.96

2015-10-23 Denton, TX
Texas Woman's
West Tex. A&M
3
2
25
18
25
12
19
25
22
25
19
17
GAME

75.73

2015-10-27 Lawton, OK
Cameron
West Tex. A&M
3
2
24
26
25
18
25
23
25
27
15
12
GAME

75.62

2015-11-20 Stephenville, TX
Angelo St.
Texas Woman's
3
1
25
18
25
22
22
25
26
24
GAME

75.59

2015-09-22 Denton, TX
Texas Woman's
Tarleton St.
1
3
20
25
25
21
28
30
19
25
GAME

73.36

2015-10-17 San Angelo, Texas
Angelo St.
Texas Woman's
3
0
26
24
25
21
25
19
GAME

73.11

2015-10-21 Stephenville, TX
Tarleton St.
Angelo St.
3
1
25
23
26
28
28
26
25
19
GAME

72.52

2015-11-07 Commerce, Texas
Tex. A&M-Commerce
Cameron
1
3
26
24
19
25
24
26
22
25
GAME

72.38

2015-09-16 San Angelo, TX
Angelo St.
Tarleton St.
3
1
25
22
18
25
25
14
25
20
GAME

72.20

2015-10-30 Canyon, TX
West Tex. A&M
Angelo St.
2
3
25
17
17
25
21
25
25
22
13
15
GAME

72.00

2015-09-22 Commerce, Texas
Tex. A&M-Commerce
Angelo St.
0
3
24
26
23
25
24
26

HuskerGeek Lone Star All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 32.9027
2 31.6583
3 29.8117
4 26.7072
5 26.0473
6 25.5747
7 23.7779
8 23.3474
9 22.1771
10 21.9544

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.2395
2 20.0313
3 18.5572
4 17.8763
5 16.8925
6 14.6530
7 14.1320
8 14.1078
9 13.2887
10 11.0227

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.8100
2 18.8213
3 16.0462
4 15.5025
5 15.1672
6 15.1587
7 13.8129
8 13.2782
9 13.2274
10 12.6632

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2632
2 0.2214
3 0.2171
4 0.2118
5 0.2092
6 0.2085
7 0.2079
8 0.2033
9 0.1930
10 0.1852

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1619
2 0.1461
3 0.1453
4 0.1401
5 0.1373
6 0.1331
7 0.1321
8 0.1089
9 0.1083
10 0.1045

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1530
2 0.1515
3 0.1315
4 0.1291
5 0.1291
6 0.1248
7 0.1233
8 0.1221
9 0.1149
10 0.1135


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek