Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Colorado Col. 1,555.8172 1,553.0972 1,554.4566 59.03 70.30 0.274
2nd Trinity (TX) 1,547.1879 1,554.5523 1,550.8658 59.84 69.61 0.278
3rd Southwestern (TX) 1,452.5159 1,470.7355 1,461.5973 55.15 64.33 0.153
4th Texas Lutheran 1,357.6428 1,375.5417 1,366.5629 52.10 56.24 0.081
5th Austin 1,346.0156 1,361.7595 1,353.8647 50.09 58.88 0.077
6th Dallas 1,334.2671 1,350.1512 1,342.1856 50.31 56.86 0.054
7th Centenary (LA) 1,329.2142 1,351.7459 1,340.4327 49.30 56.88 0.037
8th Schreiner 1,197.7468 1,212.5905 1,205.1458 41.84 50.39 -0.085

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Trinity (TX) 0.3270 44.53 11.83 41.56 43.42 2.22 10.57
2nd Colorado Col. 0.3218 44.83 12.65 41.76 41.92 3.00 10.57
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.2502 38.39 13.36 35.58 48.26 3.41 10.56
4th Austin 0.1935 33.95 14.60 31.06 53.92 3.96 8.50
5th Dallas 0.1904 34.01 14.97 31.34 52.03 3.92 11.47
6th Centenary (LA) 0.1886 33.45 14.58 31.36 52.40 4.56 9.11
7th Texas Lutheran 0.1681 31.76 14.94 29.44 57.66 3.20 8.15
8th Schreiner 0.0940 28.05 18.65 26.23 60.13 3.99 7.45

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Colorado Col. 0.0477 23.12 18.35 21.96 62.45 5.63 4.33
2nd Trinity (TX) 0.0487 23.25 18.38 21.50 63.40 5.59 5.16
3rd Texas Lutheran 0.0869 25.91 17.23 24.43 60.86 4.93 7.16
4th Southwestern (TX) 0.0974 25.97 16.23 25.02 60.62 4.41 5.17
5th Austin 0.1162 28.97 17.35 27.06 57.01 5.71 6.29
6th Dallas 0.1366 28.81 15.14 26.62 58.78 3.64 7.32
7th Centenary (LA) 0.1517 30.75 15.59 28.76 56.92 3.41 7.04
8th Schreiner 0.1785 33.06 15.21 31.54 54.37 4.58 8.19

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,396.8889 1,402.5848 1,381.0526 1,360.2138 1,385.1851
Difference 5.6959 -15.8363 -36.6751 -15.6052

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Colorado Col. 128 3,011 1,602 251 258 53.21 12.0 11.7 2,279 837 126 184 63.27 18.1 12.4
Trinity (TX) 120 2,650 1,373 215 204 51.81 12.3 13.0 2,116 821 149 176 61.20 14.2 12.0
Southwestern (TX) 109 2,378 1,128 195 137 47.44 12.2 17.4 2,272 1,005 143 161 55.77 15.9 14.1
Centenary (LA) 112 2,395 1,125 186 143 46.97 12.9 16.7 2,433 1,159 187 184 52.36 13.0 13.2
Dallas 95 1,995 944 205 179 47.32 9.7 11.1 2,032 981 164 152 51.72 12.4 13.4
Austin 120 2,518 1,135 169 204 45.08 14.9 12.3 2,605 1,235 182 200 52.59 14.3 13.0
Texas Lutheran 108 2,164 978 135 180 45.19 16.0 12.0 2,380 1,215 195 198 48.95 12.2 12.0
Schreiner 91 1,539 557 85 119 36.19 18.1 12.9 2,187 1,226 198 194 43.94 11.0 11.3
Conference Average 110 2,331 1,105 180 178 46.65 13.5 13.4 2,288 1,060 168 181 53.73 13.9 12.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.03

2018-10-20
Trinity (TX)
Colorado Col.
2
3
24
26
25
16
25
19
23
25
13
15
GAME

73.16

2018-11-03 Irving, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
3
1
25
23
26
24
11
25
25
21
GAME

73.04

2018-11-04 Irving, Texas
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
3
2
24
26
25
22
27
25
24
26
15
8
GAME

72.51

2018-09-28 Irving, Texas
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
2
3
25
20
23
25
25
16
18
25
14
16
GAME

69.19

2018-10-12 Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
3
0
25
23
25
22
25
19
GAME

69.06

2018-10-28 Shreveport, La.
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
2
3
25
18
15
25
17
25
25
19
11
15
GAME

68.10

2018-10-20 Sherman, Texas
Austin
Centenary (LA)
1
3
26
28
25
20
30
32
23
25
GAME

67.69

2018-10-13 Seguin, Texas
Texas Lutheran
Trinity (TX)
0
3
23
25
25
27
24
26
GAME

67.49

2018-11-02 Irving, Texas
Dallas
Centenary (LA)
3
2
29
27
20
25
25
22
26
28
15
10
GAME

66.93

2018-10-13 Colorado Springs, CO
Southwestern (TX)
Austin
3
1
23
25
25
21
25
13
25
22

HuskerGeek SCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.1352
2 20.2286
3 19.9985
4 19.1994
5 19.1731
6 18.8597
7 18.2762
8 17.0864
9 16.4098
10 16.2309

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.6916
2 12.8543
3 11.5715
4 10.0756
5 10.0460
6 9.9522
7 9.8835
8 8.9281
9 8.8793
10 7.4329

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.5163
2 16.6333
3 15.7228
4 14.7182
5 13.2956
6 12.5236
7 11.1908
8 11.1260
9 10.8622
10 10.7797

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2029
2 0.1920
3 0.1905
4 0.1759
5 0.1746
6 0.1686
7 0.1677
8 0.1568
9 0.1537
10 0.1505

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1376
2 0.1179
3 0.1102
4 0.1005
5 0.0933
6 0.0902
7 0.0854
8 0.0838
9 0.0824
10 0.0809

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1714
2 0.1526
3 0.1442
4 0.1338
5 0.1325
6 0.1211
7 0.1209
8 0.1099
9 0.1027
10 0.0959


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek