Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Southeastern - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Florida 1,766.6525 1,718.1915 1,742.2535 52.14 72.66 0.260
2nd Kentucky 1,708.4072 1,650.1626 1,679.0324 48.72 69.62 0.168
3rd Texas A&M 1,681.2510 1,630.7480 1,655.8070 49.33 65.30 0.157
4th LSU 1,674.9921 1,628.1221 1,651.3908 47.39 65.24 0.126
5th Alabama 1,671.7578 1,624.2469 1,647.8311 47.11 65.67 0.117
6th Ole Miss 1,630.5167 1,577.7432 1,603.9129 44.34 63.95 0.061
7th Arkansas 1,615.4440 1,568.2328 1,591.6634 44.35 62.52 0.073
8th Missouri 1,604.4166 1,548.8706 1,576.3990 43.49 62.47 0.059
9th Georgia 1,593.3550 1,538.4873 1,565.6808 43.23 62.17 0.060
10th South Carolina 1,593.9751 1,536.0424 1,564.7406 43.96 60.70 0.032
11th Auburn 1,588.7479 1,537.6868 1,563.0088 44.28 60.01 0.038
12th Tennessee 1,523.3431 1,475.9910 1,499.4801 40.83 55.07 -0.024
13th Mississippi St. 1,488.5074 1,448.2112 1,468.2211 40.24 53.23 -0.073

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Florida 0.3647 48.22 11.75 44.33 39.76 3.89 6.97
2nd Kentucky 0.3123 42.58 11.35 38.94 44.17 4.00 5.63
3rd Texas A&M 0.3022 41.28 11.06 38.13 46.88 3.96 4.53
4th Alabama 0.2874 43.27 14.53 39.46 41.69 5.40 6.76
5th LSU 0.2719 40.73 13.54 37.93 46.23 4.07 5.90
6th Ole Miss 0.2653 41.34 14.81 38.72 45.42 5.32 5.06
7th Georgia 0.2608 39.07 12.99 36.06 49.42 4.69 5.05
8th Missouri 0.2563 39.97 14.34 36.88 46.08 5.44 4.63
9th Arkansas 0.2323 38.83 15.60 35.91 48.12 5.11 4.71
10th Auburn 0.2214 37.82 15.68 35.63 47.98 5.49 4.81
11th South Carolina 0.2160 36.11 14.51 33.88 50.71 5.06 3.75
12th Tennessee 0.1854 33.30 14.76 30.95 52.15 6.09 4.03
13th Mississippi St. 0.1636 31.04 14.68 28.88 55.14 5.26 4.91

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Florida 0.1048 30.73 20.25 28.73 52.81 8.88 2.56
2nd Kentucky 0.1445 32.57 18.12 31.11 51.14 7.49 3.35
3rd Texas A&M 0.1455 32.23 17.68 30.01 51.75 7.17 5.90
4th LSU 0.1460 31.62 17.02 29.42 53.51 7.36 4.46
5th Arkansas 0.1598 33.62 17.64 31.18 49.74 7.49 4.86
6th Alabama 0.1707 34.50 17.43 31.81 50.57 7.31 6.37
7th Auburn 0.1833 34.49 16.16 31.79 52.22 6.72 4.79
8th South Carolina 0.1836 35.32 16.97 33.56 49.40 7.01 5.28
9th Missouri 0.1973 35.85 16.12 33.01 50.51 7.19 4.40
10th Georgia 0.2004 37.34 17.29 35.25 46.77 7.39 5.43
11th Ole Miss 0.2045 36.72 16.27 35.19 48.36 6.49 4.44
12th Tennessee 0.2094 36.72 15.79 33.62 47.92 6.70 6.96
13th Mississippi St. 0.2370 37.54 13.84 34.59 49.47 5.36 6.96

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,600.7247 1,599.9043 1,602.2705 1,600.2313 1,600.7827
Difference -0.8205 1.5458 -0.4935 0.0773

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Florida 114 2,667 1,235 174 355 46.31 15.3 7.5 2,200 729 56 216 66.86 39.3 10.2
Kentucky 118 2,775 1,229 148 235 44.29 18.8 11.8 2,417 846 84 219 65.00 28.8 11.0
Alabama 133 3,070 1,420 203 301 46.25 15.1 10.2 2,715 1,018 170 286 62.51 16.0 9.5
Ole Miss 117 2,641 1,138 138 180 43.09 19.1 14.7 2,455 934 104 213 61.96 23.6 11.5
Texas A&M 117 2,576 1,141 106 167 44.29 24.3 15.4 2,412 954 147 191 60.45 16.4 12.6
LSU 116 2,618 1,129 149 232 43.13 17.6 11.3 2,463 959 109 200 61.06 22.6 12.3
Georgia 119 2,638 1,088 129 239 41.24 20.4 11.0 2,609 1,063 140 252 59.26 18.6 10.4
Missouri 128 2,752 1,132 129 221 41.13 21.3 12.5 2,728 1,114 126 256 59.16 21.7 10.7
South Carolina 123 2,649 1,119 101 158 42.24 26.2 16.8 2,651 1,114 140 295 57.98 18.9 9.0
Arkansas 120 2,581 1,040 108 233 40.29 23.9 11.1 2,625 1,086 130 263 58.63 20.2 10.0
Auburn 115 2,446 1,011 113 256 41.33 21.6 9.6 2,512 1,093 118 199 56.49 21.3 12.6
Tennessee 113 2,288 900 88 219 39.34 26.0 10.4 2,580 1,216 178 216 52.87 14.5 11.9
Mississippi St. 120 2,270 877 115 126 38.63 19.7 18.0 2,675 1,318 196 272 50.73 13.6 9.8
Conference Average 119 2,613 1,112 131 225 42.43 20.7 12.3 2,542 1,034 131 237 59.46 21.2 10.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Southeastern

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

79.92

2014-10-31 Tuscaloosa, AL
Alabama
Texas A&M
3
2
20
25
28
26
17
25
25
20
15
11
GAME

79.63

2014-10-05 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Texas A&M
3
0
25
20
28
26
30
28
GAME

78.40

2014-10-19 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
LSU
2
3
25
22
25
15
24
26
9
25
14
16
GAME

76.74

2014-09-28 Tuscaloosa, AL
Alabama
LSU
3
1
25
15
22
25
25
21
35
33
GAME

76.71

2014-10-26 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Kentucky
3
1
25
22
26
24
17
25
25
16
GAME

76.50

2014-11-23 Athens, Ga.
Georgia
South Carolina
1
3
24
26
25
17
30
32
24
26
GAME

76.36

2014-10-03 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Alabama
3
1
25
20
25
15
23
25
25
22
GAME

76.24

2014-11-26 Columbia, Mo.
Missouri
Alabama
2
3
27
25
25
23
21
25
21
25
12
15
GAME

76.04

2014-11-09 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Ole Miss
3
1
19
25
25
16
25
23
25
18
GAME

75.89

2014-10-12 Fayetteville, Ark.
Arkansas
Georgia
3
2
18
25
29
27
28
26
20
25
15
13

HuskerGeek Southeastern All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.8507
2 26.2359
3 25.4528
4 25.3968
5 24.3666
6 22.5725
7 22.5056
8 21.6174
9 21.5390
10 21.3212

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.4607
2 18.3546
3 16.9730
4 16.5201
5 15.9074
6 15.5012
7 15.2670
8 14.4120
9 14.3645
10 14.1004

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.8412
2 17.0032
3 16.6971
4 16.0333
5 15.2202
6 13.7944
7 13.6055
8 13.4855
9 12.5649
10 12.3321

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2360
2 0.2208
3 0.2175
4 0.2101
5 0.2050
6 0.2018
7 0.1946
8 0.1832
9 0.1831
10 0.1758

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1734
2 0.1569
3 0.1468
4 0.1424
5 0.1395
6 0.1306
7 0.1306
8 0.1253
9 0.1213
10 0.1192

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1883
2 0.1441
3 0.1382
4 0.1357
5 0.1260
6 0.1200
7 0.1189
8 0.1124
9 0.1074
10 0.0975


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek