Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Florida | 1,766.6525 | 1,718.1915 | 1,742.2535 | 52.14 | 72.66 | 0.260 |
2nd | Kentucky | 1,708.4072 | 1,650.1626 | 1,679.0324 | 48.72 | 69.62 | 0.168 |
3rd | Texas A&M | 1,681.2510 | 1,630.7480 | 1,655.8070 | 49.33 | 65.30 | 0.157 |
4th | LSU | 1,674.9921 | 1,628.1221 | 1,651.3908 | 47.39 | 65.24 | 0.126 |
5th | Alabama | 1,671.7578 | 1,624.2469 | 1,647.8311 | 47.11 | 65.67 | 0.117 |
6th | Ole Miss | 1,630.5167 | 1,577.7432 | 1,603.9129 | 44.34 | 63.95 | 0.061 |
7th | Arkansas | 1,615.4440 | 1,568.2328 | 1,591.6634 | 44.35 | 62.52 | 0.073 |
8th | Missouri | 1,604.4166 | 1,548.8706 | 1,576.3990 | 43.49 | 62.47 | 0.059 |
9th | Georgia | 1,593.3550 | 1,538.4873 | 1,565.6808 | 43.23 | 62.17 | 0.060 |
10th | South Carolina | 1,593.9751 | 1,536.0424 | 1,564.7406 | 43.96 | 60.70 | 0.032 |
11th | Auburn | 1,588.7479 | 1,537.6868 | 1,563.0088 | 44.28 | 60.01 | 0.038 |
12th | Tennessee | 1,523.3431 | 1,475.9910 | 1,499.4801 | 40.83 | 55.07 | -0.024 |
13th | Mississippi St. | 1,488.5074 | 1,448.2112 | 1,468.2211 | 40.24 | 53.23 | -0.073 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Florida | 0.3647 | 48.22 | 11.75 | 44.33 | 39.76 | 3.89 | 6.97 |
2nd | Kentucky | 0.3123 | 42.58 | 11.35 | 38.94 | 44.17 | 4.00 | 5.63 |
3rd | Texas A&M | 0.3022 | 41.28 | 11.06 | 38.13 | 46.88 | 3.96 | 4.53 |
4th | Alabama | 0.2874 | 43.27 | 14.53 | 39.46 | 41.69 | 5.40 | 6.76 |
5th | LSU | 0.2719 | 40.73 | 13.54 | 37.93 | 46.23 | 4.07 | 5.90 |
6th | Ole Miss | 0.2653 | 41.34 | 14.81 | 38.72 | 45.42 | 5.32 | 5.06 |
7th | Georgia | 0.2608 | 39.07 | 12.99 | 36.06 | 49.42 | 4.69 | 5.05 |
8th | Missouri | 0.2563 | 39.97 | 14.34 | 36.88 | 46.08 | 5.44 | 4.63 |
9th | Arkansas | 0.2323 | 38.83 | 15.60 | 35.91 | 48.12 | 5.11 | 4.71 |
10th | Auburn | 0.2214 | 37.82 | 15.68 | 35.63 | 47.98 | 5.49 | 4.81 |
11th | South Carolina | 0.2160 | 36.11 | 14.51 | 33.88 | 50.71 | 5.06 | 3.75 |
12th | Tennessee | 0.1854 | 33.30 | 14.76 | 30.95 | 52.15 | 6.09 | 4.03 |
13th | Mississippi St. | 0.1636 | 31.04 | 14.68 | 28.88 | 55.14 | 5.26 | 4.91 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Florida | 0.1048 | 30.73 | 20.25 | 28.73 | 52.81 | 8.88 | 2.56 |
2nd | Kentucky | 0.1445 | 32.57 | 18.12 | 31.11 | 51.14 | 7.49 | 3.35 |
3rd | Texas A&M | 0.1455 | 32.23 | 17.68 | 30.01 | 51.75 | 7.17 | 5.90 |
4th | LSU | 0.1460 | 31.62 | 17.02 | 29.42 | 53.51 | 7.36 | 4.46 |
5th | Arkansas | 0.1598 | 33.62 | 17.64 | 31.18 | 49.74 | 7.49 | 4.86 |
6th | Alabama | 0.1707 | 34.50 | 17.43 | 31.81 | 50.57 | 7.31 | 6.37 |
7th | Auburn | 0.1833 | 34.49 | 16.16 | 31.79 | 52.22 | 6.72 | 4.79 |
8th | South Carolina | 0.1836 | 35.32 | 16.97 | 33.56 | 49.40 | 7.01 | 5.28 |
9th | Missouri | 0.1973 | 35.85 | 16.12 | 33.01 | 50.51 | 7.19 | 4.40 |
10th | Georgia | 0.2004 | 37.34 | 17.29 | 35.25 | 46.77 | 7.39 | 5.43 |
11th | Ole Miss | 0.2045 | 36.72 | 16.27 | 35.19 | 48.36 | 6.49 | 4.44 |
12th | Tennessee | 0.2094 | 36.72 | 15.79 | 33.62 | 47.92 | 6.70 | 6.96 |
13th | Mississippi St. | 0.2370 | 37.54 | 13.84 | 34.59 | 49.47 | 5.36 | 6.96 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,600.7247 | 1,599.9043 | 1,602.2705 | 1,600.2313 | 1,600.7827 |
Difference | -0.8205 | 1.5458 | -0.4935 | 0.0773 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Florida | 114 | 2,667 | 1,235 | 174 | 355 | 46.31 | 15.3 | 7.5 | 2,200 | 729 | 56 | 216 | 66.86 | 39.3 | 10.2 |
Kentucky | 118 | 2,775 | 1,229 | 148 | 235 | 44.29 | 18.8 | 11.8 | 2,417 | 846 | 84 | 219 | 65.00 | 28.8 | 11.0 |
Alabama | 133 | 3,070 | 1,420 | 203 | 301 | 46.25 | 15.1 | 10.2 | 2,715 | 1,018 | 170 | 286 | 62.51 | 16.0 | 9.5 |
Ole Miss | 117 | 2,641 | 1,138 | 138 | 180 | 43.09 | 19.1 | 14.7 | 2,455 | 934 | 104 | 213 | 61.96 | 23.6 | 11.5 |
Texas A&M | 117 | 2,576 | 1,141 | 106 | 167 | 44.29 | 24.3 | 15.4 | 2,412 | 954 | 147 | 191 | 60.45 | 16.4 | 12.6 |
LSU | 116 | 2,618 | 1,129 | 149 | 232 | 43.13 | 17.6 | 11.3 | 2,463 | 959 | 109 | 200 | 61.06 | 22.6 | 12.3 |
Georgia | 119 | 2,638 | 1,088 | 129 | 239 | 41.24 | 20.4 | 11.0 | 2,609 | 1,063 | 140 | 252 | 59.26 | 18.6 | 10.4 |
Missouri | 128 | 2,752 | 1,132 | 129 | 221 | 41.13 | 21.3 | 12.5 | 2,728 | 1,114 | 126 | 256 | 59.16 | 21.7 | 10.7 |
South Carolina | 123 | 2,649 | 1,119 | 101 | 158 | 42.24 | 26.2 | 16.8 | 2,651 | 1,114 | 140 | 295 | 57.98 | 18.9 | 9.0 |
Arkansas | 120 | 2,581 | 1,040 | 108 | 233 | 40.29 | 23.9 | 11.1 | 2,625 | 1,086 | 130 | 263 | 58.63 | 20.2 | 10.0 |
Auburn | 115 | 2,446 | 1,011 | 113 | 256 | 41.33 | 21.6 | 9.6 | 2,512 | 1,093 | 118 | 199 | 56.49 | 21.3 | 12.6 |
Tennessee | 113 | 2,288 | 900 | 88 | 219 | 39.34 | 26.0 | 10.4 | 2,580 | 1,216 | 178 | 216 | 52.87 | 14.5 | 11.9 |
Mississippi St. | 120 | 2,270 | 877 | 115 | 126 | 38.63 | 19.7 | 18.0 | 2,675 | 1,318 | 196 | 272 | 50.73 | 13.6 | 9.8 |
Conference Average | 119 | 2,613 | 1,112 | 131 | 225 | 42.43 | 20.7 | 12.3 | 2,542 | 1,034 | 131 | 237 | 59.46 | 21.2 | 10.9 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
79.92 |
2014-10-31 | Tuscaloosa, AL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
79.63 |
2014-10-05 | Lexington, Ky. |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
78.40 |
2014-10-19 | Lexington, Ky. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.74 |
2014-09-28 | Tuscaloosa, AL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.71 |
2014-10-26 | College Station, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.50 |
2014-11-23 | Athens, Ga. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.36 |
2014-10-03 | Lexington, Ky. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.24 |
2014-11-26 | Columbia, Mo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.04 |
2014-11-09 | College Station, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.89 |
2014-10-12 | Fayetteville, Ark. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Rhamat Alhassan | Florida | A |
Briana Holman | LSU | A |
Alex Holston | Florida | A |
Krystal Rivers | Alabama | A |
Jackie Napper | Kentucky | D |
Morgan Bergren | Kentucky | S |
Mackenzie Dagostino | Florida | S |
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Simone Antwi | Florida | A |
Gabby Mallette | Florida | A |
Lauren O'Conner | Kentucky | A |
Anni Thomasson | Kentucky | A |
Holly Pole | Florida | D |
Stephanie Aiple | Texas A&M | S |
Malorie Pardo | LSU | S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Morgan Bergren | Kentucky |
2 | Mackenzie Dagostino | Florida |
3 | Alex Holston | Florida |
4 | Malorie Pardo | LSU |
5 | Stephanie Aiple | Texas A&M |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Alex Holston | Florida |
2 | Briana Holman | LSU |
3 | Krystal Rivers | Alabama |
4 | Anni Thomasson | Kentucky |
5 | Rhamat Alhassan | Florida |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Morgan Bergren | Kentucky |
2 | Mackenzie Dagostino | Florida |
3 | Malorie Pardo | LSU |
4 | Stephanie Aiple | Texas A&M |
5 | Aubrey Edie | Ole Miss |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Jackie Napper | Kentucky |
2 | Holly Pole | Florida |
3 | Haley Smith | LSU |
4 | Emily Hardesty | Texas A&M |
5 | Payton Harris | Mississippi St. |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Morgan Bergren | Kentucky | 27.8507 |
2 | Krystal Rivers | Alabama | 26.2359 |
3 | Aubrey Edie | Ole Miss | 25.4528 |
4 | Alexa Filley | Auburn | 25.3968 |
5 | Malorie Pardo | LSU | 24.3666 |
6 | Payton Harris | Mississippi St. | 22.5725 |
7 | Carly Kan | Missouri | 22.5056 |
8 | Anni Thomasson | Kentucky | 21.6174 |
9 | Sierra Wilson | Alabama | 21.5390 |
10 | Stephanie Aiple | Texas A&M | 21.3212 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Morgan Bergren | Kentucky | 20.4607 |
2 | Aubrey Edie | Ole Miss | 18.3546 |
3 | Sierra Wilson | Alabama | 16.9730 |
4 | Malorie Pardo | LSU | 16.5201 |
5 | Briana Holman | LSU | 15.9074 |
6 | Krystal Rivers | Alabama | 15.5012 |
7 | Stephanie Aiple | Texas A&M | 15.2670 |
8 | Alexa Filley | Auburn | 14.4120 |
9 | Kat Hutson | Alabama | 14.3645 |
10 | Nakeyta Clair | Ole Miss | 14.1004 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Payton Harris | Mississippi St. | 21.8412 |
2 | Jackie Napper | Kentucky | 17.0032 |
3 | Mikaela Christiaansen | South Carolina | 16.6971 |
4 | Haley Smith | LSU | 16.0333 |
5 | Sarah Meister | Missouri | 15.2202 |
6 | Gaby Smiley | Georgia | 13.7944 |
7 | Alyssa Ivey | Auburn | 13.6055 |
8 | Monica Bollinger | Arkansas | 13.4855 |
9 | Cara Fisher | Ole Miss | 12.5649 |
10 | Natalie Murison | Alabama | 12.3321 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Morgan Bergren | Kentucky | 0.2360 |
2 | Alexa Filley | Auburn | 0.2208 |
3 | Aubrey Edie | Ole Miss | 0.2175 |
4 | Malorie Pardo | LSU | 0.2101 |
5 | Stephanie Aiple | Texas A&M | 0.2050 |
6 | Krystal Rivers | Alabama | 0.2018 |
7 | Payton Harris | Mississippi St. | 0.1946 |
8 | Anni Thomasson | Kentucky | 0.1832 |
9 | Briana Holman | LSU | 0.1831 |
10 | Carly Kan | Missouri | 0.1758 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Morgan Bergren | Kentucky | 0.1734 |
2 | Aubrey Edie | Ole Miss | 0.1569 |
3 | Stephanie Aiple | Texas A&M | 0.1468 |
4 | Malorie Pardo | LSU | 0.1424 |
5 | Briana Holman | LSU | 0.1395 |
6 | Sierra Wilson | Alabama | 0.1306 |
7 | Nakeyta Clair | Ole Miss | 0.1306 |
8 | Alexa Filley | Auburn | 0.1253 |
9 | Lauren O'Conner | Kentucky | 0.1213 |
10 | Krystal Rivers | Alabama | 0.1192 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Payton Harris | Mississippi St. | 0.1883 |
2 | Jackie Napper | Kentucky | 0.1441 |
3 | Haley Smith | LSU | 0.1382 |
4 | Mikaela Christiaansen | South Carolina | 0.1357 |
5 | Alyssa Ivey | Auburn | 0.1260 |
6 | Gaby Smiley | Georgia | 0.1200 |
7 | Sarah Meister | Missouri | 0.1189 |
8 | Monica Bollinger | Arkansas | 0.1124 |
9 | Cara Fisher | Ole Miss | 0.1074 |
10 | Holly Pole | Florida | 0.0975 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.