Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Southeastern - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Florida 1,775.9900 1,656.3209 1,715.1121 51.82 71.70 0.272
2nd Texas A&M 1,710.7402 1,601.9560 1,655.4548 48.62 67.21 0.173
3rd Kentucky 1,701.9227 1,585.8353 1,642.8540 49.86 66.57 0.163
4th Missouri 1,692.0775 1,582.7929 1,636.5232 48.96 65.37 0.146
5th Auburn 1,653.3800 1,551.8545 1,601.8131 45.67 63.90 0.094
6th Arkansas 1,650.1295 1,535.7930 1,591.9351 45.72 65.02 0.122
7th Alabama 1,638.7993 1,538.1073 1,587.6552 43.76 64.80 0.069
8th Ole Miss 1,624.3661 1,510.8895 1,566.6007 45.21 60.82 0.065
9th South Carolina 1,607.5274 1,511.6343 1,558.8437 43.52 61.15 0.047
10th Tennessee 1,608.8163 1,489.6411 1,548.0823 44.38 60.84 0.055
11th Mississippi St. 1,596.4114 1,487.1453 1,540.8101 44.20 59.52 0.031
12th LSU 1,593.5456 1,464.6811 1,527.7553 44.71 58.63 0.032
13th Georgia 1,524.7454 1,394.9686 1,458.4142 39.72 54.81 -0.043

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Florida 0.3705 47.36 10.32 43.27 41.84 3.71 5.96
2nd Texas A&M 0.3239 45.42 13.03 42.57 40.37 5.39 4.61
3rd Missouri 0.2915 41.90 12.75 38.52 45.96 4.19 6.47
4th Kentucky 0.2827 41.95 13.68 38.18 43.43 5.11 6.63
5th Arkansas 0.2800 42.90 14.89 40.25 42.52 5.15 4.92
6th Alabama 0.2659 42.08 15.49 39.00 43.09 6.58 6.36
7th Ole Miss 0.2401 40.96 16.95 37.40 44.13 6.35 6.65
8th Auburn 0.2361 38.31 14.70 35.82 47.11 5.40 6.07
9th South Carolina 0.2341 38.70 15.29 35.96 47.93 4.94 5.66
10th Tennessee 0.2327 37.32 14.05 34.58 49.00 5.94 4.67
11th Mississippi St. 0.2152 38.60 17.08 36.17 47.11 5.95 6.51
12th LSU 0.2002 34.66 14.65 32.39 52.17 4.51 5.60
13th Georgia 0.1793 34.49 16.55 31.66 51.49 6.05 5.63

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Florida 0.0988 29.31 19.43 27.61 54.09 8.74 4.42
2nd Kentucky 0.1197 30.08 18.11 28.18 53.32 8.66 3.97
3rd Auburn 0.1417 30.53 16.36 28.06 56.45 6.44 4.24
4th Missouri 0.1456 33.10 18.54 30.85 51.24 8.80 4.73
5th Texas A&M 0.1514 32.52 17.38 30.43 52.30 7.76 4.88
6th Arkansas 0.1581 33.26 17.45 30.85 50.83 7.63 4.86
7th LSU 0.1684 32.78 15.94 30.88 54.84 5.89 4.18
8th Ole Miss 0.1753 34.19 16.66 31.76 50.32 6.47 6.26
9th Tennessee 0.1772 34.00 16.27 31.98 50.64 6.39 5.37
10th Mississippi St. 0.1839 35.40 17.01 33.66 49.15 6.41 5.09
11th South Carolina 0.1872 34.33 15.60 31.98 51.51 6.06 4.63
12th Alabama 0.1971 34.82 15.12 32.76 51.39 5.98 4.65
13th Georgia 0.2222 38.28 16.06 35.97 47.09 6.70 7.47

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,587.0657 1,587.1207 1,586.1242 1,584.4933 1,586.2010
Difference 0.0550 -0.9415 -2.5723 -1.1529

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Florida 117 2,729 1,251 144 291 45.84 19.0 9.4 2,309 795 109 200 65.57 21.2 11.5
Missouri 128 2,933 1,327 176 198 45.24 16.7 14.8 2,626 1,007 129 259 61.65 20.4 10.1
Kentucky 112 2,590 1,144 147 233 44.17 17.6 11.1 2,390 931 103 202 61.05 23.2 11.8
Texas A&M 115 2,592 1,123 100 165 43.33 25.9 15.7 2,419 928 128 185 61.64 18.9 13.1
Tennessee 118 2,642 1,172 121 207 44.36 21.8 12.8 2,486 1,009 138 269 59.41 18.0 9.2
Ole Miss 125 2,802 1,245 185 216 44.43 15.1 13.0 2,654 1,081 165 222 59.27 16.1 12.0
Auburn 121 2,647 1,126 146 318 42.54 18.1 8.3 2,548 1,020 112 240 59.97 22.8 10.6
Arkansas 114 2,419 1,007 108 204 41.63 22.4 11.9 2,325 912 123 241 60.77 18.9 9.6
Alabama 126 2,840 1,162 169 289 40.92 16.8 9.8 2,756 1,069 132 269 61.21 20.9 10.2
Mississippi St. 111 2,419 1,064 158 277 43.99 15.3 8.7 2,392 1,026 122 218 57.11 19.6 11.0
South Carolina 114 2,504 1,036 134 248 41.37 18.7 10.1 2,501 1,043 119 237 58.30 21.0 10.6
LSU 108 2,222 888 111 223 39.96 20.0 10.0 2,454 1,128 110 223 54.03 22.3 11.0
Georgia 98 1,888 703 106 212 37.24 17.8 8.9 2,236 1,090 178 238 51.25 12.6 9.4
Conference Average 116 2,556 1,096 139 237 42.69 18.9 11.1 2,469 1,003 128 231 59.33 19.7 10.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Southeastern

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

80.89

2015-10-28 Columbia, Mo.
Missouri
Alabama
3
2
33
35
25
20
26
28
25
19
15
10
GAME

79.10

2015-10-16 Auburn, Ala.
Auburn
Kentucky
2
3
25
22
22
25
25
23
21
25
12
15
GAME

78.45

2015-10-18 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Florida
1
3
25
22
21
25
22
25
20
25
GAME

78.33

2015-11-08 Auburn, Ala.
Auburn
Florida
3
2
25
22
16
25
24
26
25
21
18
16
GAME

78.07

2015-11-15 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Missouri
2
3
27
25
19
25
25
23
19
25
14
16
GAME

78.06

2015-09-30 Columbia, Mo.
Missouri
Florida
3
2
22
25
20
25
25
21
25
19
15
10
GAME

77.47

2015-10-25 Baton Rouge, La.
LSU
Auburn
3
2
25
22
19
25
29
27
31
33
15
11
GAME

77.33

2015-11-22 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Florida
3
2
20
25
19
25
25
22
25
22
15
11
GAME

77.06

2015-10-11 Tuscaloosa, AL
Alabama
Missouri
3
2
25
21
25
27
23
25
25
17
15
11
GAME

76.68

2015-09-23 Baton Rouge, La.
LSU
Arkansas
2
3
23
25
28
26
24
26
25
20
9
15

HuskerGeek Southeastern All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.8112
2 28.7466
3 27.5243
4 25.5642
5 24.6623
6 24.6154
7 21.7393
8 21.2815
9 21.0243
10 20.4510

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.7029
2 19.0294
3 17.6548
4 16.8100
5 15.7196
6 14.8254
7 14.4426
8 14.2863
9 13.8283
10 13.5511

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.1209
2 16.5156
3 15.9309
4 15.8959
5 15.8115
6 15.6998
7 14.9129
8 13.8184
9 13.5922
10 13.2900

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2300
2 0.2275
3 0.2251
4 0.2243
5 0.2218
6 0.2183
7 0.2045
8 0.2029
9 0.1971
10 0.1911

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1591
2 0.1576
3 0.1510
4 0.1444
5 0.1389
6 0.1323
7 0.1312
8 0.1230
9 0.1228
10 0.1182

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1707
2 0.1500
3 0.1365
4 0.1362
5 0.1346
6 0.1246
7 0.1236
8 0.1235
9 0.1231
10 0.1202


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek