Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Landmark - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Juniata 1,463.1158 1,435.6281 1,449.3068 59.22 66.97 0.254
2nd Scranton 1,394.1351 1,364.4864 1,379.2311 54.51 62.23 0.158
3rd Susquehanna 1,388.5716 1,361.2676 1,374.8518 54.09 64.91 0.178
4th Elizabethtown 1,338.6135 1,301.8487 1,320.1031 48.97 60.90 0.106
5th Catholic 1,261.2648 1,239.9333 1,250.5536 49.21 56.32 0.021
6th Moravian 1,249.4971 1,233.9147 1,241.6815 47.75 55.13 0.014
7th Goucher 1,116.4954 1,112.3162 1,114.4038 39.07 51.68 -0.103

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Susquehanna 0.2768 39.56 11.88 35.84 48.61 3.66 8.80
2nd Juniata 0.2735 41.59 14.23 38.46 44.53 3.07 10.68
3rd Scranton 0.2444 37.50 13.06 34.57 49.43 3.75 10.08
4th Elizabethtown 0.2420 37.69 13.49 35.13 50.57 4.80 8.24
5th Catholic 0.1768 32.69 15.01 30.13 51.42 4.90 8.91
6th Moravian 0.1697 32.59 15.62 30.66 51.83 3.99 8.51
7th Goucher 0.1303 32.85 19.83 30.54 52.25 4.31 10.29

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Juniata 0.0197 21.98 20.01 20.51 63.61 6.75 5.92
2nd Scranton 0.0862 26.63 18.01 25.42 58.79 4.98 7.36
3rd Susquehanna 0.0992 27.61 17.69 25.71 56.78 5.72 5.32
4th Elizabethtown 0.1365 30.91 17.26 28.79 54.31 4.29 5.87
5th Moravian 0.1560 31.27 15.67 29.61 56.82 3.92 6.48
6th Catholic 0.1563 30.58 14.95 28.28 57.19 3.72 6.50
7th Goucher 0.2329 36.73 13.44 33.23 52.21 4.06 9.26

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,304.3045 1,313.2842 1,315.1695 1,320.1031 1,313.2153
Difference 8.9797 10.8650 15.7986 11.8811

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Scranton 147 3,239 1,690 296 282 52.18 10.9 11.5 2,695 1,116 237 257 58.59 11.4 10.5
Juniata 121 2,398 1,180 223 231 49.21 10.8 10.4 2,147 915 180 229 57.38 11.9 9.4
Susquehanna 118 2,144 1,029 173 197 47.99 12.4 10.9 1,972 829 168 222 57.96 11.7 8.9
Elizabethtown 103 1,931 928 195 226 48.06 9.9 8.5 1,761 744 147 216 57.75 12.0 8.2
Catholic 122 2,111 996 189 164 47.18 11.2 12.9 2,123 1,004 207 209 52.71 10.3 10.2
Moravian 122 2,255 1,034 191 254 45.85 11.8 8.9 2,334 1,118 190 241 52.10 12.3 9.7
Goucher 81 1,499 592 156 261 39.49 9.6 5.7 1,790 904 187 177 49.50 9.6 10.1
Conference Average 116 2,225 1,064 203 231 47.14 10.9 9.8 2,117 947 188 222 55.14 11.3 9.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Landmark

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

68.86

2017-11-01 Scranton, Pa.
Scranton
Susquehanna
3
2
25
17
22
25
29
27
21
25
15
12
GAME

63.79

2017-10-14 Bethlehem, Pa.
Elizabethtown
Susquehanna
1
3
22
25
25
23
19
25
14
25
GAME

63.36

2017-10-28 Selinsgrove, Pa.
Juniata
Scranton
2
3
25
20
26
24
12
25
18
25
13
15
GAME

61.90

2017-11-04 Huntingdon, Pa.
Juniata
Scranton
3
0
25
14
25
16
25
21
GAME

60.46

2017-09-30 Elizabethtown, Pa.
Elizabethtown
Juniata
1
3
11
25
25
20
22
25
16
25
GAME

60.26

2017-10-28 Selinsgrove, Pa.
Susquehanna
Scranton
3
1
25
14
25
19
18
25
25
18
GAME

59.92

2017-10-28 Selinsgrove, Pa.
Susquehanna
Juniata
0
3
14
25
12
25
17
25
GAME

59.09

2017-09-30 Elizabethtown, Pa.
Elizabethtown
Moravian
1
3
24
26
19
25
25
19
22
25
GAME

58.96

2017-09-30 Scranton, Pa.
Catholic
Susquehanna
0
3
19
25
25
27
18
25
GAME

58.64

2017-10-14 Bethlehem, Pa.
Elizabethtown
Scranton
1
3
19
25
11
25
25
19
13
25

HuskerGeek Landmark All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.1623
2 25.9425
3 22.6705
4 19.1956
5 18.4090
6 16.7663
7 15.1856
8 15.0345
9 13.6837
10 13.6779

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.9200
2 15.5871
3 15.5383
4 11.3035
5 10.2182
6 9.7698
7 9.6444
8 9.5462
9 8.7703
10 7.3687

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.9376
2 15.2042
3 15.0485
4 11.3382
5 11.2626
6 11.2098
7 10.6241
8 10.0224
9 8.9333
10 8.4895

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2425
2 0.2162
3 0.1918
4 0.1858
5 0.1793
6 0.1777
7 0.1644
8 0.1629
9 0.1557
10 0.1541

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1488
2 0.1316
3 0.1284
4 0.1278
5 0.1177
6 0.1164
7 0.1148
8 0.1051
9 0.0987
10 0.0909

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1661
2 0.1475
3 0.1310
4 0.1260
5 0.1219
6 0.1161
7 0.0937
8 0.0913
9 0.0878
10 0.0842


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek