Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

MAAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Fairfield 1,536.9947 1,504.1184 1,520.4677 46.24 54.96 -0.044
2nd Marist 1,494.5188 1,461.3458 1,477.8392 44.06 50.75 -0.079
3rd Canisius 1,461.1052 1,429.8185 1,445.3772 43.19 49.98 -0.096
4th Rider 1,458.5794 1,423.4557 1,440.9105 42.21 50.97 -0.120
5th Niagara 1,439.8333 1,404.0675 1,421.8379 41.94 48.47 -0.134
6th Quinnipiac 1,431.9902 1,402.5555 1,417.1964 44.09 47.99 -0.136
7th Iona 1,378.0483 1,345.0429 1,361.4456 42.33 41.93 -0.182
8th Siena 1,369.7624 1,338.7162 1,354.1504 36.08 48.69 -0.177
9th Manhattan 1,364.7077 1,331.9816 1,348.2453 38.44 47.67 -0.193
10th Saint Peter's 1,338.8865 1,306.6427 1,322.6663 29.74 20.97 -0.243

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Marist 0.1774 33.61 15.86 32.02 50.35 7.32 5.94
2nd Fairfield 0.1772 34.47 16.75 32.60 50.64 5.85 6.61
3rd Niagara 0.1599 29.25 13.26 27.54 58.47 4.37 4.13
4th Canisius 0.1530 29.65 14.35 27.29 56.95 5.18 5.80
5th Rider 0.1350 31.37 17.87 29.80 53.13 6.27 5.18
6th Siena 0.1340 30.12 16.71 27.87 53.76 6.79 4.35
7th Quinnipiac 0.1193 29.41 17.48 27.78 51.68 8.85 4.20
8th Manhattan 0.0995 27.07 17.11 24.33 57.96 5.75 5.80
9th Iona 0.0930 26.61 17.30 24.89 57.26 5.39 6.42
10th Saint Peter's 0.0733 22.48 15.16 21.12 63.34 8.62 12.82

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Fairfield 0.2209 35.45 13.36 33.15 51.25 5.56 8.44
2nd Canisius 0.2491 38.53 13.62 35.85 47.51 4.80 8.21
3rd Quinnipiac 0.2553 38.96 13.42 35.75 46.11 4.97 6.55
4th Rider 0.2554 38.86 13.31 35.99 47.36 5.82 8.52
5th Marist 0.2564 38.95 13.31 35.89 47.45 5.17 9.37
6th Iona 0.2754 40.03 12.49 36.55 44.25 4.69 7.12
7th Manhattan 0.2927 43.14 13.87 39.37 41.75 4.64 9.39
8th Niagara 0.2937 41.61 12.23 38.53 45.21 4.18 7.91
9th Siena 0.3112 43.06 11.94 39.72 43.85 5.05 7.63
10th Saint Peter's 0.3159 43.45 11.86 40.22 43.63 2.62 5.73

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,411.0137 1,408.3753 1,406.8197 1,410.3476 1,409.1391
Difference -2.6383 -4.1940 -0.6660 -2.4995

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Fairfield 110 2,596 1,483 192 182 57.13 13.5 14.3 1,972 835 152 211 57.66 13.0 9.3
Canisius 123 2,762 1,492 179 204 54.02 15.4 13.5 2,508 1,195 183 192 52.35 13.7 13.1
Marist 115 2,571 1,369 168 207 53.25 15.3 12.4 2,329 1,106 204 201 52.51 11.4 11.6
Rider 115 2,320 1,193 167 220 51.42 13.9 10.5 2,167 1,007 182 225 53.53 11.9 9.6
Quinnipiac 114 2,567 1,368 139 164 53.29 18.5 15.7 2,348 1,150 134 213 51.02 17.5 11.0
Siena 111 2,510 1,280 145 258 51.00 17.3 9.7 2,378 1,127 158 185 52.61 15.1 12.9
Niagara 105 2,266 1,171 117 146 51.68 19.4 15.5 2,245 1,099 163 224 51.05 13.8 10.0
Manhattan 115 2,463 1,225 164 257 49.74 15.0 9.6 2,494 1,227 206 280 50.80 12.1 8.9
Iona 101 2,001 1,026 153 226 51.27 13.1 8.9 2,224 1,229 144 160 44.74 15.4 13.9
Saint Peter's 109 1,045 379 153 179 36.27 6.8 5.8 3,364 2,952 160 230 12.25 21.0 14.6
Conference Average 112 2,310 1,199 158 204 50.91 14.8 11.6 2,403 1,293 169 212 47.85 14.5 11.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the MAAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

85.62

2019-09-28 Jersey City, NJ
Saint Peter's
Marist
2
3
25
20
22
25
25
27
25
20
12
15
GAME

77.15

2019-11-03 Jersey City, NJ
Saint Peter's
Canisius
1
3
25
23
19
25
23
25
16
25
GAME

71.44

2019-09-29 Jersey City, NJ
Saint Peter's
Siena
1
3
23
25
25
23
22
25
24
26
GAME

71.18

2019-11-02 Lawrenceville, NJ
Rider
Canisius
3
1
27
25
26
28
25
15
25
19
GAME

70.88

2019-09-22
Marist
Quinnipiac
3
1
26
24
23
25
25
18
25
21
GAME

70.81

2019-10-26
Marist
Rider
0
3
27
29
24
26
27
29
GAME

70.79

2019-11-02 Jersey City, NJ
Saint Peter's
Niagara
1
3
15
25
25
16
19
25
16
25
GAME

70.65

2019-11-16
Canisius
Fairfield
3
2
26
28
25
20
19
25
25
19
15
10
GAME

69.93

2019-11-07
Canisius
Niagara
1
3
26
24
14
25
28
30
13
25
GAME

69.43

2019-11-03 Lawrenceville, NJ
Rider
Niagara
3
0
25
18
37
35
25
23

HuskerGeek MAAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.7256
2 27.1002
3 23.2510
4 23.2094
5 23.2017
6 22.3530
7 22.2926
8 20.1284
9 19.7024
10 18.9980

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.6560
2 15.5587
3 13.6503
4 13.3201
5 12.4205
6 11.9014
7 11.9004
8 11.7945
9 10.5338
10 9.8921

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 23.9009
2 19.0545
3 17.5386
4 17.0173
5 16.6871
6 16.3812
7 14.1669
8 13.7917
9 12.7435
10 12.5342

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2710
2 0.2477
3 0.2320
4 0.2186
5 0.2135
6 0.2129
7 0.2004
8 0.1961
9 0.1940
10 0.1879

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1766
2 0.1338
3 0.1337
4 0.1297
5 0.1184
6 0.1168
7 0.1139
8 0.1113
9 0.1026
10 0.1012

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2366
2 0.1736
3 0.1638
4 0.1609
5 0.1588
6 0.1451
7 0.1379
8 0.1314
9 0.1279
10 0.1181


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek