Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NEWMAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st MIT 1,561.0211 1,554.6855 1,557.8501 63.05 57.36 0.260
2nd Babson 1,462.1382 1,463.9236 1,463.0307 59.00 53.88 0.175
3rd Emerson 1,457.9800 1,460.2771 1,459.1281 57.47 56.65 0.160
4th Springfield 1,436.0929 1,436.4051 1,436.2490 57.84 51.85 0.140
5th Smith 1,391.2510 1,385.3005 1,388.2726 54.44 50.29 0.102
6th Coast Guard 1,369.6045 1,369.2387 1,369.4216 51.25 50.65 0.053
7th WPI 1,342.0186 1,340.3774 1,341.1977 55.19 46.01 0.038
8th Clark (MA) 1,302.0707 1,304.1405 1,303.1052 50.81 48.36 -0.002
9th Wheaton (MA) 1,301.8802 1,302.2961 1,302.0881 54.98 44.30 0.046
10th Mount Holyoke 1,245.6471 1,243.4517 1,244.5489 52.37 43.09 -0.087
11th Wellesley 1,228.8273 1,226.7227 1,227.7745 49.47 41.54 -0.075

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st MIT 0.3026 42.48 12.22 39.30 42.91 3.88 11.72
2nd Emerson 0.2594 39.98 14.03 37.21 45.69 3.89 11.32
3rd Babson 0.2360 38.56 14.95 35.49 46.93 3.77 11.31
4th Springfield 0.2269 37.94 15.25 35.50 48.14 4.01 10.30
5th Smith 0.2108 37.40 16.32 34.24 45.68 4.70 11.17
6th Wheaton (MA) 0.1959 35.09 15.51 30.70 46.45 3.36 12.57
7th Coast Guard 0.1885 35.17 16.32 31.84 48.65 4.21 11.01
8th Clark (MA) 0.1731 31.81 14.50 29.87 54.14 4.72 7.52
9th WPI 0.1664 33.17 16.53 30.78 52.44 4.12 10.90
10th Wellesley 0.1294 31.70 18.76 28.89 50.34 4.85 9.01
11th Mount Holyoke 0.1026 27.60 17.35 25.28 59.42 4.90 9.98

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st MIT 0.0428 23.22 18.94 20.95 61.15 5.35 6.47
2nd Babson 0.0612 23.86 17.74 22.10 61.07 5.16 7.63
3rd Springfield 0.0865 26.06 17.41 23.92 59.09 5.71 6.33
4th Emerson 0.0996 27.42 17.46 25.65 59.75 4.66 8.54
5th Smith 0.1093 28.91 17.98 24.85 51.72 6.60 7.85
6th WPI 0.1282 27.61 14.79 25.29 59.29 3.79 8.65
7th Coast Guard 0.1352 29.53 16.01 26.37 57.02 6.01 8.16
8th Wheaton (MA) 0.1495 29.40 14.45 25.48 52.70 4.69 9.10
9th Clark (MA) 0.1752 33.61 16.10 31.17 52.05 4.98 8.44
10th Mount Holyoke 0.1893 34.11 15.18 30.83 52.31 4.03 10.00
11th Wellesley 0.2041 34.22 13.81 30.24 52.20 3.15 10.95

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,372.0606 1,367.4491 1,371.3518 1,367.6492 1,369.6277
Difference -4.6115 -0.7088 -4.4114 -3.2439

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
MIT 109 2,611 1,517 275 253 58.10 9.5 10.3 2,063 960 160 229 53.47 12.9 9.0
Emerson 79 1,644 906 184 143 55.11 8.9 11.5 1,357 612 143 161 54.90 9.5 8.4
Springfield 98 1,947 1,085 213 223 55.73 9.1 8.7 1,724 870 145 243 49.54 11.9 7.1
Babson 114 2,558 1,385 251 350 54.14 10.2 7.3 2,335 1,149 204 270 50.79 11.4 8.6
Mount Holyoke 83 1,653 966 234 154 58.44 7.1 10.7 1,561 846 158 196 45.80 9.9 8.0
WPI 89 1,960 1,085 224 243 55.36 8.8 8.1 1,882 1,003 177 191 46.71 10.6 9.9
Smith 123 2,159 1,140 265 285 52.80 8.1 7.6 2,041 1,048 232 243 48.65 8.8 8.4
Coast Guard 92 2,004 1,028 212 229 51.30 9.5 8.8 1,903 967 159 214 49.19 12.0 8.9
Wheaton (MA) 99 1,744 960 240 303 55.05 7.3 5.8 1,768 994 204 199 43.78 8.7 8.9
Clark (MA) 95 1,795 896 151 170 49.92 11.9 10.6 1,965 1,043 199 236 46.92 9.9 8.3
Wellesley 91 1,677 831 153 174 49.55 11.0 9.6 1,920 1,119 226 196 41.72 8.5 9.8
Conference Average 97 1,977 1,073 218 230 54.14 9.2 9.0 1,865 965 182 216 48.31 10.4 8.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NEWMAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

70.27

2022-09-13
Emerson
MIT
2
3
26
28
25
22
24
26
25
17
13
15
GAME

66.77

2022-10-18
Mount Holyoke
WPI
2
3
20
25
25
23
27
25
22
25
14
16
GAME

66.22

2022-09-24
MIT
WPI
3
1
21
25
25
13
25
20
27
25
GAME

66.17

2022-11-06
MIT
Babson
3
1
25
19
19
25
25
22
25
23
GAME

66.16

2022-09-20
Babson
Springfield
3
2
17
25
25
27
25
20
25
20
15
12
GAME

65.98

2022-09-24
Springfield
Emerson
3
2
19
25
25
18
25
23
10
25
15
3
GAME

65.76

2022-10-04
Babson
Emerson
3
1
22
25
25
17
25
23
25
19
GAME

65.62

2022-11-01
Babson
Clark (MA)
3
1
25
21
20
25
25
19
25
22
GAME

65.03

2022-09-27
Springfield
MIT
0
3
17
25
13
25
22
25
GAME

64.73

2022-11-05
MIT
Smith
3
1
25
20
25
18
22
25
25
18

HuskerGeek NEWMAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 15.3554
2 15.2212
3 14.9037
4 14.2820
5 14.1898
6 14.1102
7 13.8831
8 13.5743
9 13.0013
10 12.7187

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.1301
2 8.9581
3 8.3661
4 7.9515
5 7.5865
6 7.5662
7 7.4705
8 7.1916
9 7.1468
10 6.8614

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 13.7409
2 13.7219
3 11.7863
4 11.4110
5 10.3753
6 9.5127
7 9.4828
8 9.3193
9 9.2815
10 8.9697

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2045
2 0.1774
3 0.1770
4 0.1676
5 0.1669
6 0.1633
7 0.1602
8 0.1552
9 0.1531
10 0.1515

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1323
2 0.1153
3 0.1097
4 0.1054
5 0.1008
6 0.0948
7 0.0947
8 0.0947
9 0.0934
10 0.0822

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1598
2 0.1412
3 0.1399
4 0.1324
5 0.1265
6 0.1259
7 0.1254
8 0.1165
9 0.1091
10 0.0995


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek