Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NEWMAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st MIT 1,572.8247 1,575.0712 1,573.9476 63.90 59.02 0.257
2nd Springfield 1,480.0029 1,482.7416 1,481.3716 59.25 52.59 0.152
3rd Babson 1,475.0895 1,475.2761 1,475.1828 58.51 53.66 0.164
4th Emerson 1,442.4300 1,451.7548 1,447.0849 57.87 54.54 0.132
5th Coast Guard 1,439.3563 1,438.3052 1,438.8307 54.93 52.80 0.130
6th Smith 1,428.2624 1,427.0480 1,427.6551 57.78 49.21 0.116
7th Wellesley 1,384.2648 1,381.7742 1,383.0189 55.36 47.64 0.017
8th Clark (MA) 1,352.9336 1,352.5395 1,352.7366 52.57 51.55 0.021
9th Salve Regina 1,341.4794 1,341.0032 1,341.2413 54.05 47.18 0.021
10th Wheaton (MA) 1,331.2673 1,334.8062 1,333.0356 54.74 44.71 0.017
11th WPI 1,309.4184 1,307.9358 1,308.6769 56.17 43.96 0.008
12th Mount Holyoke 1,268.7717 1,268.5684 1,268.6701 57.33 42.33 -0.053

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st MIT 0.3231 43.26 10.95 39.44 42.59 4.05 12.31
2nd Springfield 0.2479 40.31 15.52 37.24 44.55 4.17 13.56
3rd Emerson 0.2365 36.81 13.17 34.13 50.19 3.69 11.98
4th Babson 0.2355 37.41 13.86 34.02 48.39 3.15 12.45
5th Coast Guard 0.2326 35.95 12.69 32.81 49.98 3.89 9.77
6th Smith 0.2121 37.41 16.20 34.66 47.36 4.96 9.31
7th Salve Regina 0.1906 32.74 13.68 29.96 49.82 3.61 10.44
8th Clark (MA) 0.1861 32.03 13.42 30.19 52.43 4.92 7.16
9th Wheaton (MA) 0.1718 34.93 17.75 30.64 48.92 4.56 12.61
10th WPI 0.1661 33.18 16.57 30.85 52.91 4.17 8.83
11th Wellesley 0.1590 32.34 16.44 29.59 51.61 5.04 11.15
12th Mount Holyoke 0.1061 25.50 14.89 23.44 59.77 4.32 11.74

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st MIT 0.0665 25.03 18.38 22.96 61.19 5.43 6.98
2nd Babson 0.0717 26.15 18.98 23.97 58.47 5.82 6.79
3rd Springfield 0.0957 27.39 17.81 25.54 57.94 5.86 7.14
4th Smith 0.0965 27.78 18.13 25.49 57.72 6.69 6.02
5th Coast Guard 0.1024 26.88 16.64 24.45 59.29 4.74 6.81
6th Emerson 0.1046 28.67 18.21 26.76 56.86 6.18 8.38
7th Wellesley 0.1421 29.70 15.49 27.29 59.57 3.36 6.74
8th Wheaton (MA) 0.1550 31.41 15.91 27.56 53.93 4.76 8.23
9th WPI 0.1579 31.61 15.82 29.17 54.98 3.89 9.63
10th Mount Holyoke 0.1595 30.63 14.67 27.47 57.07 2.00 8.77
11th Clark (MA) 0.1651 33.00 16.49 31.17 53.18 3.74 7.01
12th Salve Regina 0.1693 31.67 14.74 29.68 52.78 4.03 6.83

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,402.6210 1,398.8834 1,399.8482 1,398.4279 1,399.9451
Difference -3.7376 -2.7728 -4.1931 -3.5678

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
MIT 122 2,702 1,607 321 232 59.47 8.4 11.6 2,033 900 184 194 55.73 11.0 10.5
Babson 117 2,089 1,165 290 328 55.77 7.2 6.4 1,841 902 185 239 51.01 10.0 7.7
Coast Guard 107 1,857 1,004 215 265 54.07 8.6 7.0 1,564 758 170 210 51.54 9.2 7.4
Springfield 119 2,703 1,505 328 280 55.68 8.2 9.7 2,387 1,209 198 264 49.35 12.1 9.0
Emerson 88 1,841 993 195 129 53.94 9.4 14.3 1,680 832 170 177 50.48 9.9 9.5
Clark (MA) 111 1,640 868 176 157 52.93 9.3 10.4 1,574 777 177 274 50.64 8.9 5.7
Smith 109 2,404 1,354 203 224 56.32 11.8 10.7 2,209 1,171 163 183 46.99 13.6 12.1
Mount Holyoke 91 1,748 1,032 238 199 59.04 7.3 8.8 1,861 1,080 180 196 41.97 10.3 9.5
Wellesley 95 2,025 1,094 215 191 54.03 9.4 10.6 1,956 1,055 153 221 46.06 12.8 8.9
Salve Regina 106 1,969 1,060 219 280 53.83 9.0 7.0 1,977 1,078 173 219 45.47 11.4 9.0
WPI 91 1,751 974 149 197 55.63 11.8 8.9 1,848 1,043 212 164 43.56 8.7 11.3
Wheaton (MA) 109 1,987 1,077 265 312 54.20 7.5 6.4 1,991 1,127 218 239 43.40 9.1 8.3
Conference Average 105 2,060 1,144 235 233 55.41 9.0 9.3 1,910 994 182 215 48.02 10.6 9.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

HuskerGeek NEWMAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 21.7106
2 18.9970
3 18.6143
4 17.7230
5 16.4481
6 15.8997
7 15.3911
8 14.7165
9 14.2181
10 13.9699

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.1258
2 13.0881
3 11.4336
4 10.3340
5 10.2035
6 9.3720
7 9.1761
8 8.9129
9 8.8984
10 8.5073

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.7399
2 13.2264
3 12.5695
4 11.8602
5 11.5328
6 11.1063
7 10.8859
8 9.5127
9 9.3976
10 8.8130

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1900
2 0.1893
3 0.1840
4 0.1838
5 0.1710
6 0.1688
7 0.1651
8 0.1638
9 0.1635
10 0.1605

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1309
2 0.1282
3 0.1202
4 0.1092
5 0.1079
6 0.1061
7 0.0996
8 0.0984
9 0.0973
10 0.0945

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1654
2 0.1470
3 0.1424
4 0.1379
5 0.1373
6 0.1357
7 0.1354
8 0.1274
9 0.1214
10 0.1180


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek