Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big 12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Texas 1,706.6973 1,704.5907 1,705.6437 81.11 89.78 0.355
2nd Baylor 1,653.2707 1,652.8420 1,653.0563 79.02 84.03 0.289
3rd Kansas 1,602.3859 1,595.9664 1,599.1729 80.69 80.26 0.188
4th Kansas St. 1,576.5680 1,574.4227 1,575.4950 76.75 80.99 0.190
5th Iowa St. 1,535.8143 1,537.5955 1,536.7046 77.24 79.41 0.160
6th Texas Tech 1,514.4289 1,511.9307 1,513.1793 75.28 77.97 0.142
7th West Virginia 1,482.6320 1,486.8854 1,484.7572 75.23 76.34 0.083
8th Oklahoma 1,482.8140 1,482.5958 1,482.7049 71.64 79.13 0.141
9th TCU 1,469.4957 1,466.2212 1,467.8576 71.69 75.92 0.069

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas 0.4986 49.53 -0.33 45.37 40.33 2.10 8.89
2nd Baylor 0.3952 44.53 5.01 40.98 42.21 3.73 5.39
3rd Kansas 0.3759 40.33 2.73 36.64 48.06 3.78 8.01
4th Kansas St. 0.3713 42.31 5.18 38.89 44.88 4.66 7.49
5th Texas Tech 0.3680 40.22 3.42 36.40 48.52 4.33 7.45
6th Oklahoma 0.3565 41.38 5.73 38.13 45.89 3.88 6.40
7th Iowa St. 0.3504 40.34 5.30 37.19 46.39 3.81 7.13
8th TCU 0.3244 40.02 7.58 36.84 45.14 5.61 5.66
9th West Virginia 0.2852 36.78 8.27 33.51 47.93 5.48 5.98

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Baylor 0.1060 23.93 13.33 23.01 57.57 9.18 4.60
2nd Texas 0.1440 26.41 12.01 24.11 54.43 9.24 5.70
3rd Kansas St. 0.1813 27.57 9.44 25.57 55.76 6.54 6.37
4th Kansas 0.1879 29.62 10.83 27.39 53.24 7.79 5.77
5th Iowa St. 0.1907 28.55 9.48 26.81 54.75 6.10 6.24
6th West Virginia 0.2018 28.39 8.21 26.37 55.32 6.13 5.31
7th Oklahoma 0.2158 32.23 10.65 29.30 50.43 8.15 6.86
8th Texas Tech 0.2263 31.54 8.91 29.10 53.18 6.55 6.27
9th TCU 0.2550 33.15 7.65 30.02 51.55 6.45 4.44

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,557.6191 1,549.2957 1,541.8618 1,541.7930 1,547.6424
Difference -8.3233 -15.7573 -15.8261 -13.3022

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas 96 2,198 1,102 155 272 50.14 14.2 8.1 1,813 679 99 168 62.55 18.3 10.8
Kansas 59 1,348 709 91 124 52.60 14.8 10.9 1,184 519 62 146 56.17 19.1 8.1
Baylor 78 1,664 788 76 169 47.36 21.9 9.8 1,490 641 73 185 56.98 20.4 8.1
Kansas St. 85 1,826 860 113 182 47.10 16.2 10.0 1,774 810 107 168 54.34 16.6 10.6
Iowa St. 74 1,609 782 91 160 48.60 17.7 10.1 1,618 774 100 140 52.16 16.2 11.6
West Virginia 69 1,224 564 65 124 46.08 18.8 9.9 1,277 612 77 177 52.08 16.6 7.2
Texas Tech 67 1,393 637 86 161 45.73 16.2 8.7 1,494 730 86 98 51.14 17.4 15.2
Oklahoma 64 1,325 547 62 157 41.28 21.4 8.4 1,461 698 96 161 52.23 15.2 9.1
TCU 67 1,380 595 67 139 43.12 20.6 9.9 1,509 754 60 122 50.03 25.2 12.4
Conference Average 73 1,552 732 90 165 46.89 18.0 9.5 1,513 691 84 152 54.19 18.3 10.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big 12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.49

2020-11-06
Texas
Baylor
3
2
23
25
24
26
25
23
25
13
15
9
GAME

77.05

2020-11-08
Texas
Baylor
3
2
25
22
26
24
27
29
14
25
15
6
GAME

76.98

2021-03-03
Texas
Baylor
3
1
25
22
25
17
17
25
25
20
GAME

76.26

2020-10-16
Kansas St.
Texas
2
3
19
25
25
21
25
20
18
25
7
15
GAME

74.02

2020-10-01
West Virginia
Kansas St.
2
3
21
25
25
17
27
25
24
26
13
15
GAME

73.84

2020-11-20
Baylor
Kansas St.
3
1
25
15
24
26
27
25
25
19
GAME

73.42

2021-03-26
Baylor
Texas
1
3
18
25
31
29
28
30
19
25
GAME

73.14

2020-10-17
Oklahoma
Kansas
3
2
13
25
23
25
25
22
25
16
15
13
GAME

73.07

2020-09-25
Kansas St.
Iowa St.
2
3
22
25
20
25
25
19
25
15
14
16
GAME

73.06

2020-10-02
West Virginia
Kansas St.
2
3
25
21
28
30
26
24
17
25
8
15

HuskerGeek Big 12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.3844
2 18.4854
3 17.0950
4 13.4153
5 13.1730
6 12.7681
7 11.2788
8 11.2742
9 10.8783
10 10.8500

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.7583
2 12.7529
3 11.0732
4 10.7863
5 9.1274
6 8.2844
7 7.6032
8 7.4915
9 7.4804
10 7.3753

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.1510
2 10.9034
3 8.8868
4 7.8123
5 7.6261
6 7.5302
7 7.5189
8 7.0668
9 6.9893
10 6.8288

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2498
2 0.2433
3 0.2071
4 0.2014
5 0.1868
6 0.1843
7 0.1841
8 0.1839
9 0.1838
10 0.1780

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1723
2 0.1604
3 0.1479
4 0.1296
5 0.1289
6 0.1204
7 0.1160
8 0.1155
9 0.1133
10 0.1045

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1473
2 0.1347
3 0.1312
4 0.1276
5 0.1221
6 0.1201
7 0.1104
8 0.1043
9 0.0989
10 0.0936


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek