Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Southeastern - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Florida 1,800.6761 1,731.6783 1,765.8402 54.42 73.78 0.285
2nd Missouri 1,787.7208 1,732.4114 1,759.8489 53.84 73.31 0.271
3rd Kentucky 1,727.3577 1,671.1331 1,699.0129 50.95 68.87 0.189
4th Texas A&M 1,711.4518 1,664.4020 1,687.7630 50.85 66.76 0.166
5th Alabama 1,682.0818 1,628.1849 1,654.9140 46.97 67.73 0.109
6th LSU 1,679.8170 1,629.7549 1,654.5966 48.19 66.04 0.135
7th Auburn 1,672.9536 1,630.4601 1,651.5702 50.04 63.85 0.117
8th Georgia 1,670.1289 1,607.0203 1,638.2708 48.66 65.74 0.121
9th Arkansas 1,664.8780 1,611.3996 1,637.9206 48.64 63.98 0.103
10th Ole Miss 1,620.9776 1,565.1205 1,592.8042 45.27 62.41 0.063
11th Mississippi St. 1,592.9170 1,529.0335 1,560.6484 43.43 60.93 0.036
12th South Carolina 1,585.0744 1,508.7410 1,546.4368 42.52 61.22 0.039
13th Tennessee 1,564.8471 1,506.0539 1,535.1691 42.78 58.84 0.011

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Missouri 0.3978 49.61 9.83 47.07 38.86 3.91 6.97
2nd Florida 0.3852 49.19 10.67 44.61 39.81 3.02 7.57
3rd Kentucky 0.3054 44.06 13.51 40.74 42.43 4.98 5.65
4th Texas A&M 0.3046 42.55 12.09 39.39 45.29 4.95 5.68
5th Alabama 0.2893 43.97 15.04 41.05 40.13 6.43 6.14
6th Georgia 0.2730 40.89 13.60 37.77 46.58 5.22 6.13
7th LSU 0.2626 38.54 12.28 35.28 49.06 4.48 4.78
8th Auburn 0.2583 40.31 14.47 37.21 45.73 5.49 5.62
9th Arkansas 0.2489 40.74 15.85 37.82 44.71 5.91 6.69
10th Ole Miss 0.2447 40.69 16.23 37.00 44.53 5.64 6.01
11th South Carolina 0.2386 39.49 15.64 36.77 45.64 5.15 3.97
12th Mississippi St. 0.2274 36.45 13.71 34.18 49.76 6.10 6.41
13th Tennessee 0.1843 33.19 14.76 30.53 52.30 5.94 3.81

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Florida 0.1005 29.07 19.02 27.22 55.70 7.23 3.24
2nd Kentucky 0.1161 30.45 18.85 28.87 53.33 8.33 3.57
3rd Missouri 0.1264 30.74 18.10 28.90 54.58 8.26 3.94
4th LSU 0.1272 30.61 17.89 29.26 53.70 8.01 3.80
5th Texas A&M 0.1390 30.77 16.87 28.64 53.87 6.93 3.73
6th Auburn 0.1412 30.17 16.05 27.92 55.83 5.70 4.51
7th Arkansas 0.1462 33.31 18.69 31.24 51.58 7.94 4.81
8th Georgia 0.1522 32.14 16.92 30.13 52.48 7.10 3.85
9th Tennessee 0.1737 32.67 15.30 30.69 53.47 5.16 5.79
10th Alabama 0.1804 34.97 16.94 32.65 49.12 5.94 4.34
11th Ole Miss 0.1819 35.83 17.64 33.74 48.11 7.10 4.71
12th Mississippi St. 0.1914 33.51 14.37 31.92 53.55 4.90 4.67
13th South Carolina 0.1992 35.99 16.06 33.56 48.51 6.71 5.70

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,644.9843 1,643.9806 1,641.9445 1,645.4056 1,644.0787
Difference -1.0037 -3.0398 0.4213 -1.2074

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Missouri 117 2,848 1,399 179 225 49.12 15.9 12.7 2,183 699 95 187 67.98 23.0 11.7
Florida 108 2,559 1,224 170 290 47.83 15.1 8.8 2,053 678 71 183 66.98 28.9 11.2
Alabama 122 2,650 1,208 154 229 45.59 17.2 11.6 2,329 862 119 269 62.99 19.6 8.7
Kentucky 111 2,526 1,106 118 214 43.79 21.4 11.8 2,319 875 97 191 62.27 23.9 12.1
Georgia 119 2,630 1,157 140 168 43.99 18.8 15.7 2,417 935 93 184 61.32 26.0 13.1
Texas A&M 111 2,528 1,130 123 139 44.70 20.6 18.2 2,350 935 97 156 60.21 24.2 15.1
Auburn 108 2,405 1,093 116 134 45.45 20.7 17.9 2,259 927 106 178 58.96 21.3 12.7
LSU 134 2,975 1,311 113 195 44.07 26.3 15.3 2,819 1,138 122 220 59.63 23.1 12.8
Arkansas 112 2,507 1,064 141 193 42.44 17.8 13.0 2,487 1,047 121 199 57.90 20.6 12.5
Ole Miss 113 2,422 1,011 129 204 41.74 18.8 11.9 2,433 1,023 117 203 57.95 20.8 12.0
Tennessee 114 2,441 1,066 83 165 43.67 29.4 14.8 2,501 1,135 154 233 54.62 16.2 10.7
Mississippi St. 112 2,395 972 143 187 40.59 16.7 12.8 2,476 1,067 119 165 56.91 20.8 15.0
South Carolina 108 2,205 869 80 171 39.41 27.6 12.9 2,348 1,019 144 204 56.60 16.3 11.5
Conference Average 115 2,545 1,124 130 193 44.03 20.5 13.6 2,383 949 112 198 60.33 21.9 12.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Southeastern

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

82.30

2013-11-10 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
LSU
3
2
23
25
25
16
26
24
25
27
15
13
GAME

81.13

2013-10-20 Columbia, Mo.
Missouri
Florida
3
1
25
23
25
23
23
25
25
18
GAME

81.12

2013-11-15 Baton Rouge, La.
LSU
Auburn
2
3
24
26
25
18
25
18
26
28
11
15
GAME

80.73

2013-11-03 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Florida
2
3
26
24
23
25
8
25
26
24
14
16
GAME

80.49

2013-11-22 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Texas A&M
3
0
26
24
25
23
26
24
GAME

80.46

2013-11-27 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Florida
2
3
11
25
26
28
25
22
25
18
10
15
GAME

80.10

2013-09-27 Baton Rouge, La.
LSU
Georgia
2
3
26
24
21
25
25
16
25
27
9
15
GAME

79.97

2013-11-15 Gainesville, Fla.
Florida
Missouri
0
3
22
25
23
25
23
25
GAME

78.42

2013-10-20 Fayetteville, Ark.
Arkansas
Georgia
3
1
25
23
25
23
22
25
25
23
GAME

78.27

2013-10-18 Tuscaloosa, Ala.
Alabama
Texas A&M
3
0
33
31
25
22
25
23

HuskerGeek Southeastern All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.7371
2 27.3102
3 26.4647
4 24.5241
5 23.6870
6 23.3319
7 22.8260
8 22.1674
9 21.5435
10 21.4458

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.0815
2 18.4808
3 16.6373
4 15.8809
5 15.8754
6 15.4041
7 15.0663
8 14.4807
9 14.4353
10 13.7125

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.5515
2 19.3098
3 16.9073
4 15.7755
5 15.1503
6 14.6764
7 14.0033
8 13.3525
9 12.0040
10 11.9061

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2499
2 0.2262
3 0.2179
4 0.2134
5 0.2102
6 0.2096
7 0.2085
8 0.2023
9 0.2001
10 0.1966

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1809
2 0.1580
3 0.1499
4 0.1498
5 0.1460
6 0.1408
7 0.1357
8 0.1341
9 0.1285
10 0.1254

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1755
2 0.1746
3 0.1510
4 0.1359
5 0.1283
6 0.1273
7 0.1262
8 0.1100
9 0.1095
10 0.1089


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek