Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Louisville 1,717.9455

Football georgia 12.7744
Men's Soccer new hampshire 10.6445
Women's Soccer north carolina 11.4036
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.1463
Field Hockey penn st 9.6697

SCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Trinity (TX) 1,721.1144 1,722.2158 1,721.6650 76.54 77.00 0.233
2nd Southwestern (TX) 1,598.6705 1,598.6354 1,598.6529 71.71 69.89 0.063
3rd Colorado Col. 1,575.9339 1,577.9336 1,576.9335 71.50 72.57 0.116
4th Texas Lutheran 1,502.6132 1,510.7228 1,506.6626 71.05 63.94 -0.007
5th St. Thomas (TX) 1,457.9859 1,456.1021 1,457.0437 68.62 64.08 -0.058
6th Austin 1,428.7067 1,434.5475 1,431.6241 64.08 66.07 -0.038
7th Schreiner 1,391.9719 1,400.7112 1,396.3347 58.37 62.97 -0.141
8th Dallas 1,363.2372 1,371.6714 1,367.4478 64.11 56.43 -0.128
9th Centenary (LA) 1,312.4489 1,324.4957 1,318.4586 65.26 53.83 -0.155

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Trinity (TX) 0.3890 43.04 4.14 38.81 44.15 5.06 6.86
2nd Colorado Col. 0.3636 39.27 2.91 36.93 47.95 4.51 8.74
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.2845 35.30 6.85 32.43 51.43 5.25 8.56
4th Texas Lutheran 0.2418 30.83 6.65 28.91 59.41 5.18 7.17
5th Austin 0.2177 28.01 6.24 24.85 56.66 4.69 7.97
6th Schreiner 0.2041 29.88 9.47 27.37 55.16 5.41 6.34
7th St. Thomas (TX) 0.1970 28.62 8.92 25.95 58.74 6.10 6.24
8th Centenary (LA) 0.1873 27.39 8.66 24.38 56.16 6.50 5.73
9th Dallas 0.1728 27.35 10.07 25.09 58.40 5.75 7.34

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Trinity (TX) 0.1560 26.92 11.32 24.45 56.20 6.48 6.26
2nd Southwestern (TX) 0.2217 29.97 7.80 27.17 56.32 3.36 7.52
3rd Colorado Col. 0.2474 32.91 8.17 29.77 52.66 4.42 5.75
4th Texas Lutheran 0.2487 32.38 7.51 30.45 53.52 3.49 7.67
5th St. Thomas (TX) 0.2549 34.75 9.26 32.10 47.85 6.90 5.94
6th Austin 0.2553 34.12 8.59 30.93 46.27 4.84 10.04
7th Dallas 0.3009 37.15 7.07 34.08 47.44 2.41 8.62
8th Centenary (LA) 0.3420 38.10 3.90 34.47 42.38 2.43 10.82
9th Schreiner 0.3455 40.97 6.42 37.93 44.39 2.37 8.38

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,486.0914 1,476.3856 1,473.7197 1,465.1101 1,475.3267
Difference -9.7058 -12.3717 -20.9813 -14.3529

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Trinity (TX) 42 927 550 73 72 59.33 12.7 12.9 682 287 40 71 57.92 17.1 9.6
Colorado Col. 49 1,064 605 109 120 56.86 9.8 8.9 853 375 50 85 56.04 17.1 10.0
Austin 33 749 429 78 68 57.28 9.6 11.0 644 307 57 56 52.33 11.3 11.5
Southwestern (TX) 44 887 500 87 78 56.37 10.2 11.4 757 371 67 79 50.99 11.3 9.6
Texas Lutheran 40 780 453 73 57 58.08 10.7 13.7 750 405 56 50 46.00 13.4 15.0
Dallas 37 760 402 74 71 52.90 10.3 10.7 783 442 69 69 43.55 11.3 11.3
Centenary (LA) 26 466 256 40 38 54.94 11.7 12.3 514 301 48 34 41.44 10.7 15.1
St. Thomas (TX) 30 321 165 43 35 51.40 7.5 9.2 371 214 47 54 42.32 7.9 6.9
Schreiner 28 417 191 45 50 45.80 9.3 8.3 482 261 50 48 45.85 9.6 10.0
Conference Average 37 708 395 69 65 54.77 10.2 10.9 648 329 54 61 48.49 12.2 11.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

77.44

2021-09-24
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
3
1
21
25
31
29
25
21
25
22
GAME

69.77

2021-09-25
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
0
3
20
25
10
25
13
25
GAME

68.98

2021-09-24 Colorado Springs, CO
St. Thomas (TX)
Trinity (TX)
0
3
15
25
22
25
11
25
GAME

68.83

2021-09-24 Colorado Springs, CO
Texas Lutheran
Trinity (TX)
0
3
11
25
10
25
21
25
GAME

68.05

2021-09-25 Colorado Springs, CO
Southwestern (TX)
St. Thomas (TX)
3
0
25
21
25
16
25
20
GAME

65.60

2021-09-24 Colorado Springs, Colo.
Southwestern (TX)
Texas Lutheran
3
1
25
16
25
22
18
25
25
17
GAME

65.43

2021-09-25 Colorado Springs, CO
Schreiner
Texas Lutheran
0
3
18
25
21
25
23
25
GAME

64.47

2021-09-25
Dallas
Austin
1
3
25
16
24
26
18
25
19
25
GAME

64.04

2021-09-24
Colorado Col.
Schreiner
3
0
25
14
25
12
25
23
GAME

60.92

2021-09-25 Irving, TX
Austin
Centenary (LA)
3
1
25
22
25
18
15
25
25
10

HuskerGeek SCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 9.5687
2 8.9353
3 8.0796
4 7.0774
5 6.9375
6 6.7057
7 6.6598
8 6.1026
9 5.8214
10 5.6234

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 6.7012
2 5.6082
3 3.6958
4 3.5403
5 3.5329
6 3.0388
7 2.9553
8 2.8791
9 2.8407
10 2.7698

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 6.3006
2 6.2385
3 4.5878
4 4.5467
5 4.2716
6 4.2365
7 3.9605
8 3.6669
9 3.3816
10 3.2076

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2929
2 0.2567
3 0.2213
4 0.2126
5 0.1986
6 0.1913
7 0.1879
8 0.1875
9 0.1850
10 0.1842

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1671
2 0.1489
3 0.1365
4 0.1246
5 0.1228
6 0.0999
7 0.0960
8 0.0957
9 0.0893
10 0.0839

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1733
2 0.1703
3 0.1564
4 0.1390
5 0.1145
6 0.1069
7 0.1057
8 0.1018
9 0.0995
10 0.0988


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek