Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Trinity (TX) 1,623.5666 1,623.7892 1,623.6779 64.74 62.08 0.332
2nd Southwestern (TX) 1,552.1947 1,550.6656 1,551.4300 65.40 55.21 0.250
3rd Texas Lutheran 1,551.4653 1,549.7451 1,550.6049 64.82 56.64 0.241
4th Colorado Col. 1,510.8787 1,512.1138 1,511.4961 60.89 57.41 0.222
5th St. Thomas (TX) 1,507.0016 1,506.2980 1,506.6497 63.45 55.43 0.215
6th Austin 1,439.5340 1,437.7930 1,438.6632 56.75 54.36 0.138
7th Dallas 1,372.9403 1,371.2707 1,372.1053 52.16 51.70 0.065
8th Schreiner 1,364.8705 1,364.0635 1,364.4670 58.93 47.43 0.073
9th Centenary (LA) 1,326.6002 1,327.4898 1,327.0450 53.58 49.14 0.036

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Trinity (TX) 0.3506 45.70 10.63 42.08 43.14 2.84 9.79
2nd Texas Lutheran 0.3002 38.78 8.76 34.54 44.17 2.49 9.96
3rd Colorado Col. 0.2890 40.91 12.00 37.59 42.11 4.47 10.13
4th Southwestern (TX) 0.2850 39.99 11.49 35.60 44.62 2.60 10.39
5th St. Thomas (TX) 0.2629 37.21 10.92 32.16 43.62 2.29 11.23
6th Austin 0.2256 35.74 13.18 31.64 53.67 3.33 9.19
7th Dallas 0.1966 34.68 15.02 31.14 52.85 4.20 9.62
8th Schreiner 0.1811 30.82 12.71 28.24 56.78 3.40 8.78
9th Centenary (LA) 0.1792 33.26 15.34 30.86 54.47 4.69 8.60

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Trinity (TX) 0.0185 23.41 21.56 22.46 60.03 8.54 5.93
2nd Southwestern (TX) 0.0350 22.65 19.15 21.13 58.72 5.82 5.21
3rd St. Thomas (TX) 0.0479 22.66 17.87 20.08 55.22 5.88 5.64
4th Texas Lutheran 0.0593 23.33 17.40 22.00 57.09 5.07 5.73
5th Colorado Col. 0.0668 24.73 18.05 23.23 61.43 4.75 5.26
6th Austin 0.0875 27.96 19.21 26.75 56.61 5.91 7.59
7th Schreiner 0.1084 26.60 15.76 24.66 60.15 3.46 6.49
8th Dallas 0.1319 30.19 17.00 28.62 56.19 4.25 8.00
9th Centenary (LA) 0.1436 31.66 17.29 30.20 54.65 4.30 8.05

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,471.7932 1,470.7738 1,475.9039 1,485.6030 1,476.0185
Difference -1.0195 4.1106 13.8098 5.6336

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Trinity (TX) 123 2,875 1,577 193 146 54.85 14.9 19.7 2,410 1,121 178 236 53.49 13.5 10.2
Texas Lutheran 127 2,829 1,638 213 224 57.90 13.3 12.6 2,450 1,225 156 201 50.00 15.7 12.2
St. Thomas (TX) 97 2,101 1,215 187 209 57.83 11.2 10.1 1,863 946 113 157 49.22 16.5 11.9
Southwestern (TX) 101 2,283 1,304 171 150 57.12 13.4 15.2 2,039 1,062 125 127 47.92 16.3 16.1
Colorado Col. 107 2,397 1,292 175 269 53.90 13.7 8.9 2,229 1,102 127 144 50.56 17.6 15.5
Austin 103 2,218 1,126 148 158 50.77 15.0 14.0 2,259 1,178 186 198 47.85 12.1 11.4
Schreiner 113 2,257 1,214 147 144 53.79 15.4 15.7 2,496 1,450 170 184 41.91 14.7 13.6
Dallas 98 1,969 930 143 175 47.23 13.8 11.3 2,213 1,198 186 195 45.87 11.9 11.3
Centenary (LA) 85 1,628 785 100 99 48.22 16.3 16.4 1,969 1,116 163 138 43.32 12.1 14.3
Conference Average 106 2,284 1,231 164 175 53.51 14.1 13.8 2,214 1,155 156 176 47.79 14.5 12.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.25

2022-11-04 Colorado Springs, CO
Trinity (TX)
Texas Lutheran
2
3
25
27
25
22
23
25
25
20
6
15
GAME

73.77

2022-10-29 Seguin, TX
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
2
3
21
25
19
25
25
16
26
24
12
15
GAME

72.96

2022-10-29
Texas Lutheran
Colorado Col.
1
3
25
15
24
26
18
25
26
28
GAME

71.86

2022-11-04
Colorado Col.
St. Thomas (TX)
3
2
23
25
30
28
25
18
13
25
15
10
GAME

71.62

2022-10-19
Southwestern (TX)
St. Thomas (TX)
1
3
20
25
21
25
25
17
23
25
GAME

71.57

2022-10-07 Colorado Springs, CO
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
1
3
20
25
19
25
25
18
24
26
GAME

71.56

2022-10-02 Georgetown, TX
Austin
St. Thomas (TX)
3
1
22
25
25
19
25
23
28
26
GAME

70.59

2022-10-07 Colorado Springs, CO
Schreiner
Texas Lutheran
1
3
19
25
24
26
25
21
20
25
GAME

70.45

2022-10-01
Schreiner
Colorado Col.
2
3
25
20
22
25
25
20
12
25
12
15
GAME

70.23

2022-10-07 Colorado Springs, CO
St. Thomas (TX)
Trinity (TX)
0
3
20
25
19
25
29
31

HuskerGeek SCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.1191
2 22.5666
3 21.7457
4 19.3736
5 18.3799
6 18.2066
7 18.0519
8 16.2869
9 14.9056
10 14.6325

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.2681
2 12.2112
3 11.2232
4 10.6957
5 9.3833
6 9.1135
7 8.9863
8 8.8255
9 8.5009
10 7.7288

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.8618
2 14.1378
3 13.3873
4 12.9307
5 12.8214
6 12.6141
7 12.0789
8 12.0401
9 11.3434
10 10.8510

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2267
2 0.1850
3 0.1827
4 0.1803
5 0.1777
6 0.1718
7 0.1718
8 0.1530
9 0.1497
10 0.1496

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1203
2 0.1018
3 0.1000
4 0.0941
5 0.0929
6 0.0920
7 0.0852
8 0.0776
9 0.0766
10 0.0755

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1837
2 0.1575
3 0.1339
4 0.1321
5 0.1220
6 0.1204
7 0.1192
8 0.1176
9 0.1116
10 0.1095


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek